Former Director of N.I.H. Explains Why Embronic Stem Cells are Obsolete

Citing a number of examples which demonstrate the “markedly diminished need for expanding these cell lines for either patient therapy or basic research”, Bernardine Healy, M.D., explains in clear and logical terms why embryonic stem cells are obsolete.

According to Dr. Healy’s article in U.S. News and World Report, “Even for strong backers of embryonic stem cell research, the decision is no longer as self-evident as it was, because there is markedly diminished need for expanding these cell lines for either patient therapy or basic research. In fact, during the first six weeks of Obama’s term, several events reinforced the notion that embryonic stem cells, once thought to hold the cure for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and diabetes, are obsolete. The most sobering: a report from Israel published in PLoS Medicine in late February that shows embryonic stem cells injected into patients can cause disabling if not deadly tumors.”

As Dr. Healy further explains, “The report describes a young boy with a fatal neuromuscular disease called ataxia telangiectasia, who was treated with embryonic stem cells. Within four years, he developed headaches and was found to have multiple tumors in his brain and spinal cord that genetically matched the female embryos used in his therapy.” (Please see the related news article on this website, entitled, “Fetal Stem Cell Therapy Could Prove Fatal”, dated February 17, 2009).

Such findings should make everyone rethink, among other things, Geron’s upcoming clinical trials with human embryonic stem cells, and Dr. Healy even suggests that the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) should reconsider the wisdom of having granted such authorization in the first place. According to Dr. Healy, “His experience [the Israeli boy who developed the tumors] is neither an anomaly nor a surprise, but one feared by many scientists. These still-mysterious cell creations have been removed from the highly ordered environment of a fast-growing embryo, after all. Though they are tamed in a petri dish to be disciplined, mature cells, research in animals has shown repeatedly that sometimes the injected cells run wildly out of control – dashing hopes of tiny, human embryos benignly spinning off stem cells to save grown-ups, without risk or concern. That dream was still alive only a few weeks before this report. Within days of Obama’s inauguration, the Food and Drug Administration approved its first-ever embryonic stem cell study in humans: the biotech company Geron’s plan to inject highly purified human embryonic cells into eight to 10 patients with acute spinal cord injuries. (The cells are from a stem cell line approved by Bush because it predated his ban). The FDA should now be compelled to take another look: Are eight to 10 patients enough, or one year of monitoring sufficient, to assess safety? And doctors who participate in the trial will have to ask what every doctor must ask before performing research on a human subject: Were I this patient, would I participate? Would I encourage my loved ones to do so?”

In acknowledging the extraordinary successes that have already been accomplished with adult stem cells, Dr. Healy adds, “Even as the future of embryonic stem cells has dimmed, adult stem cell research has scored major wins evident just in the past few months. These advances involve human stem cells that are not derived from human embryos. In fact, adult stem cells, which occur in small quantities in organs throughout the body for natural growth and repair, have become stars despite great skepticism early on. … Such stem cells can be removed almost as easily as drawing a unit of blood, and they have been used successfully for years in bone marrow transplants. To date, most of the stem cell triumphs that the public hears about involve the infusion of adult stem cells. We’ve just recently seen separate research reports of patients with spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis benefiting from adult stem cell therapy.”

Even iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cells, which are also not without their own dangers, are more promising than embryonic stem cells, and on this topic Dr. Healy cites not only the inherent medical risks of iPS cells but also the advice of the first scientist who ever isolated an embryonic stem cell, the famous Dr. James Thomson. As Dr. Healy describes, “While these cells [iPS cells] might become a choice for patient therapy in time, scientists are playing this down for now. Why? These embryonic-like cells also come with the risk of cancer. James Thomson, the stem cell pioneer from the University of Wisconsin who was the first to grow human embryonic stem cells in 1998, is an independent codiscoverer of iPS cells along with Japanese scientists. Already these reprogrammed cells have eclipsed the value of those harvested from embryos, he has said, because of significantly lower cost, ease of production, and genetic identity with the patient. They also bring unique application to medical and pharmaceutical research, because cells cultivated from patients with certain diseases readily become laboratory models for developing and testing therapy.”

Finally, Dr. Healy points out another important distinction which is often overlooked, namely, the distinction between the simple act of overturning President Bush’s restriction on the use of federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research, which President Obama has promised to do, and the far more difficult task of repealing the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which became law under the Clinton Administration and which forbids both the creation and the destruction of embryos for scientific research. In regard to this matter, Dr. Healy has this to say: “The importance of stem cells for medical research has never been greater, and the scientific and public clamor for unimpeded research is fully understandable. But it’s important that Obama and everyone supporting a lifting of the ban be clear with the public on what is involved in this decision; it’s more complex than advertised. The more ethically charged decision – less understood by the public and one Congress has avoided – involves the ban on creating human embryos in the laboratory solely for research purposes. In fact, President Clinton is the one who balked at allowing scientists to use government money for embryo creation and research on stem cells harvested from such embryos; Bush only affirmed the Clinton ban. The scientific community has been able to attract nonfederal money for such work, and it is going on all the time in stem cell institutes. Scientists want relief from the inconvenience and expense of keeping that work and the money that supports it separate from federal dollars. Reversing the Executive Orders of 2 prior presidents on embryo creation, which even the Congress has been unwilling to tackle, is a far bigger issue than lifting the ban on the use of IVF embryos slated for destruction. Obama stands for transparency, and it’s important for him to make sure the public understands his decision, including that all stem cells are not the same or created equally.”

Dr. Bernardine Healy, a cardiologist who has spent more than 25 years practicing medicine, is currently a senior writer and health editor for U.S. News and World Report, and the author of the magazine’s “On Health” column. A graduate of Harvard Medical School, she was one of only ten women out of a class of 120 Harvard Medical School students at that time. She is a former Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine where she was also Director of the Coronary Care Unit and Assistant Dean for Post-Doctoral Programs and Faculty Development. She has served in the capacity of Presidential Advisor under several administrations, beginning in 1984 when President Reagan appointed her as Deputy Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush appointed her as the first woman Director of the National Institues of Health, and in the George W. Bush administration she was appointed in 2001 to the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology where she served as an advisor on bio-terrorism. Additionally, she was President of the American Heart Association from 1998 to 1999, and President and CEO of the American Red Cross from 1999 to 2001, during which time she led the response of the American Red Cross to the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, which included the creation of a $200 million family grant program for the families of victims and the initiation of a stratetic blood reserve from extra blood collections, among other programs. From 1995 to 1999 she was Professor of Medicine and Dean of the College of Medicine and Public Health at Ohio State University. She has written 2 books and coauthored more than 220 peer-reviewed manuscripts on cardiovascular research and health science policy. Despite her numerous administrative, executive and Presidential appointments, from which she became known for her outspoken and innovative policy-making decisions, she has continued to treat patients throughout much of her career. She has also served as a medical correspondent for CBS news.

Japanese Company Conducts Clinical Trials with Adult Stem Cells

The Japanese biotech company, JCR Pharmaceuticals, has announced that it has begun clinical trials for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with its proprietary product, known as JR-031, which consists of a patented preparation of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow.

GVHD is a common and potentially fatal complication of allogeneic (in which the donor and recipient are not the same person) bone marrow transplantation, for which a reliable cure has not previously existed. Conventional treatments with corticosteroids which are intended to induce T-cell immune suppression carry a high risk of infection and cancer relapse. Now, however, adult stem cells offer the first actual therapy which has already been shown to halt and reverse GVHD, without imparting further dangers and risks to the patient.

JR-031 uses adult stem cell technology originally developed by the U.S. company Osiris Therapeutics, which is currently in Phase III clinical trials with its human mesenchymal stem cell products in Europe and the U.S., where the therapy has received Fast Track designation from the corresponding regulatory agencies for the treatment of GVHD. In Japan, where Phase I and II clinical trials will be conducted at more than ten hospitals, JCR Pharmaceuticals is developing the therapy in collaboration with the Mochida Pharmaceutical Company. Some patients have already been treated with JR-031, and data should be available within the next few months. If Japan’s Ministry of Health approves JR-031, as expected, this mesenchymal stem cell product will then become the first stem cell-based therapy in Japan. In anticipation of successful clinical trials in Japan, as already demonstrated by the success of clinical trials conducted by Osiris in the U.S. and Europe, JCR Pharmaceuticals and Mochida have already entered into a formal agreement in which both companies will co-develop and commercialize JR-031 for Japan.

JCR Pharmaceuticals is focused on the R&D of human-derived bioactive substances, especially enzyme-, hormone-, and cell-based therapies for orphan diseases. The company was founded in 1975 and is based in Ashiya City, Japan. It is traded on the Osaka Stock Exchange under the symbol JCRPF.

More Canine Cures Achieved With Adult Stem Cells

Zoey, the 14-year-old American Eskimo dog, used to suffer from advanced arthritis of the hip, but found no improvement with pharmaceuticals, and hip surgery was contraindicated by his advanced age. Fortunately, however, Zoey’s owner followed the advice of Zoey’s veterinarian, and now Zoey’s hip and quality of life have both significantly improved, thanks to canine adult stem cell therapy.

According to Zoey’s owner, Raymond Walsh, “It did wonders. He is having another round. But had we not given the first shot back in August we might have had to put him under.”

Since Vet-Stem began marketing their services last year, they have now treated more than 1,500 dogs and cats with autologous adult stem cells, extracted from each animal’s own fat. The procedure is quick, simple, minimally invasive, safe, highly effective, and while it is not cheap, it is less expensive than conventional surgical and pharmaceutical therapies which may not be effective at all. The first stem cell extraction and transplant typically run between $2,500 and $3,500, although the second transplant will often cost much less since extraction is only necessary once. In Zoey’s case, additional injections of his own stem cells cost $350 each. As his owner Raymond puts it, “If it prolongs his life, it was worth it.” The entire stem cell extraction procedure consists of the approximate equivalent of 2 or 3 tablespoons of the animal’s own adipose tissue (fat) which is surgically removed under anesthesia and shipped overnight to Vet-Stem’s laboratories in southern California where the stem cells are isolated, expanded and returned two days later to the veterinarian who injects the stem cells back into the animal. Not only do the stem cells automatically target the injured tissue, but they also stimulate endogenous stem cells which in turn are mobilized into action and participate in the healing and repair process. Although improvements are usually dramatic and immediate, even after the first injection, additional injections may be necessary, depending upon the age and condition of the animal. Very few animals ever need more than a total or 2 or 3 treatments, however, before they are fully restored to their natural, pain-free state of mobility – which contrasts sharply with conventional therapies such as most prescription medications which may need to be taken indefinitely, without ever producing any tangible signs of improvement and while even possibly causing further damage to the animal through dangerous side effects and other associated risks.

Success stories are common in the field of veterinary medicine with this type of stem cell therapy, which utilizes exclusively adult stem cells, not embryonic stem cells, since embryonic stem cells are notoriously problematic and carry a number of dangerous risks, both in humans and in animals, not the least of which is the formation of teratomas (tumors).

Another success story involved the 7-year-old golden retriever named Daisy who, in the summer of last year, received the same type of autologous adult stem cell procedure as did Zoey, at which time adult stem cells derived from Daisy’s own fat were injected into both of her hind legs. Although she had previously been unable to walk at all on her left hind leg, she was restored to effortless and painless mobility following the stem cell treatment. According to her owner, Mary Benik, “She is back to what she was. Before, she had been holding her foot up, favoring it. I hope it continues to work because I have bad knees and I would do it if it could help me.”

In fact, Vet-Stem’s consistent success is becoming increasingly difficult for the human medical profession to ignore, and pioneering patients such Zoey and Daisy are now inspiring similar therapies for humans. According to the CEO of Vet-Stem, Dr. Bob Harman, “When you look at a labrador retriever with arthritis in his hips, that is the same disease that you and I have. Fractures are similar too, even though they are four-legged.”

Indeed, Vet-Stem is now working with the San Diego company Cytori Therapeutics which is harvesting adult stem cells from human adipose tissue for reconstructive breast surgery following a masectomy, by utilizing a proprietary device that has already been approved for use with breast cancer patients in Europe. According to Tom Baker, director of investor relations at Cytori, “Our first application is taking the cells out and combining them with fat to allow fat to be used as a natural filler in breast reconstruction.” Although this is just one example of a very specific application of adult stem cell technology, other applications extend throughout the vast spectrum of degenerative diseases and traumatic injuries, including those of orthopedic, cardiovascular, neurological and immunological origin, in which there is no shortage of companies that have already demonstrated impressive results in human clinical trials, such as, most notably, the adult stem cell company Osiris Therapeutics, among others.

Once again, in a symbiotic relationship that can trace its origins back throughout the millennia, it is unclear today exactly who is training whom, and who is really helping whom, in the ongoing mutual advancement and enlightenment of homo sapiens and our canine companions.

Doctors in Spain Use Adult Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease

Physicians in Barcelona are using autologous adult stem cells derived from bone marrow to treat Crohn’s disease. In other countries such as the U.S. and Italy the same procedure has already obtained excellent results, with 80% of all patients still in total remission as long as 6 years after treatment, and considerable improvement also observed even in the 20% of patients who experience partial but not complete remission.

Dr. Julian Panes and Dr. Elena Ricart of the gastroenterology department at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona have treated 6 patients thus far, 3 of whom have already completed the therapy and the other 3 of whom are still undergoing therapy. All patients are confident that they will improve.

However, the procedure in Barcelona begins with an initial treatment of chemotherapy for the specific purpose of destroying the patient’s immune system – the logic and necessity of which are being increasingly questioned. While such a procedure had previously been considered a necessary part of such therapy, even though it exposes the patient to potentially life-threatening risks, today an increasing number of doctors are questioning the medical wisdom and scientific validity of subjecting their patients to deliberate immune destruction, and in fact there is a growing body of evidence to support the idea that such dangerous immunosuppression is unnecessary. In a publication that appeared in the Journal of Translational Medicine over two years ago, in January of 2007, Dr. Neil H. Riordan et al. posed the following question: “…in patients who are not suffering from a disease that is associated with an aberrant bone marrow such as hematological malignancies or immunological dysfunctions, how is it justifiable to subject them to the high levels of morbidity and mortality associated with immune suppression?” Dr. Riordan and his team of scientists then examined compelling evidence which strongly indicates that pre-stem cell transplant immune suppression is unnecessary for many types of autologous hematopoietic cell therapies and even for some allogeneic therapies that utilize “universal donor” cells such as mesenchymal stem cells and the CD34+ stem cells that are found in umbilical cord blood, and from which immune rejection is not even a concern. As Dr. Riordan and his colleagues wrote in their 2007 paper in a section that is subtitled, “Mesenchymal stem cells do not need myeloablation for efficacy”: “Currently there are several ongoing clinical trials in Phase I-III using ‘universal donor’ mesenchymal stem cells in non-conditioned recipients of Crohn’s disease, GVHD (graft-versus-host disease) and myocardial infarction. Although these cells are bone marrow expanded mesenchymal cells, the superior proliferative potential of cord blood mesenchymal cells may allow them not only to escape immune destruction, but also to expand in vivo and mediate therapeutic effects superior to those derived from bone marrow. The fact that regulatory agencies have allowed advancement of ‘off-the-shelf’ universal donor mesenchymal stem cells supports the numerous reports of clinical efficacy in an allogeneic setting.”

Although a total remission rate of 80% is quite impressive, one can only conclude that the rate would be even higher if the patients did not have to recover from the deliberate and life-threatening destruction of their immune systems prior to receiving the stem cell therapy, and also if the stem cell therapy would utilize the “superior proliferative potential” of the “immune privileged” adult stem cells that are found in umbilical cord blood.

Crohn’s disease is a painful, inflammatory, chronic, autoimmune disease of the digestive tract for which there has previously been no known cure and which, if left untreated, is potentially fatal. Complications are numerous, conventional medical treatments are ineffective and carry a high risk of dangerous side effects, and although the precise causes are unknown there seems to be a strong genetic component associated with the disease, which afflicts approximately half a million people in the U.S. alone and over 150,000 people in Spain. Now, adult stem cells offer the first therapy that has ever actually been shown not only to reverse the course of the disease but also to heal the patient of associated physiological injury.

Parkinson’s Disease Successfully Treated with Adult Stem Cells

After isolation and in vitro expansion over several months of autologous neural stem cells that had been obtained from cortical and subcortical tissue samples of a patient during neurosurgical procedures, the neural stem cells were then carefully examined for safety, function and differentiation. It was not until nine months after harvesting of the cells that the researchers administered unilateral microinjections of the autologous cell suspensions containing differentiated dopaminergic and GABAergic neurons into the brain of a patient with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Since the cells were autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person), there was no need for immunosuppression.

According to Dr. Michel Levesque, the lead author of the study and a physician at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center as well as the UCLA School of Medicine and the Brain Research Institute at UCLA, “We have documented the first successful adult neural stem cell transplantation to reverse the effects of Parkinson’s disease, and we have also demonstrated the long term safety and therapeutic effects of this approach.”

He adds, “Of particular note are the striking results this study yielded. For the 5 years following the procedure, the patient’s motor skills improved by over 80% for at least 36 months.”

Parkinson’s disease is a neurological disorder in which impaired neurons located within the substantia nigra region of the brain are no longer able to produce dopamine, the chemical that is necessary for natural muscle movement and coordination throughout the body. In the U.S. alone, approximately 1.5 million people have already been diagnosed with the disease and approximately 60,000 new cases of Parkinson’s disease are diagnosed each year. While Parkinson’s usually develops after the age of 65, approximately 15% of all people with the disease are under the age of 50. Conventional pharmacological treatments which attempt to replace or mimic dopamine may mask the symptoms of the disease, but none have been able to reverse the progression of the disease. Additionally, side effects, contraindications and other risks associated with such drugs are a serious concern.

Now, however, as Dr. Levesque has demonstrated, adult stem cell therapy offers the first type of treatment for Parkinson’s which actually reverses the progression of the disease, safely and effectively.

Presumably not yet aware of the medical scandal caused by the fetal stem cell therapy that resulted in the development of a tumor in an Israeli boy (see the related news article on this website entitled “Fetal Stem Cell Therapy Could Prove Fatal”, dated February 17, 2009), the authors of this study nevertheless felt it important to compare their autologous adult stem cell therapy with therapies that use fetal or embryonic tissue, which, the authors point out, “carry inherent risks of immunological reactions, infectious transmission and intractable dyskinesias, in addition to serious ethical concerns”, not to mention also the risk of tumor formation. By sharp contrast, autologous adult stem cell therapy does not pose any such risks, and thereby offers a new cellular therapeutic alternative to diseases of the central nervous system, especially for the selective neural repair of discrete cell loss in progressive degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s.

As the authors conclude in their publication, “Adult neural stem cells derived from a patient’s cerebral tissue can become a source of differentiated neurons, useful for grafting in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The combined GABAergic and dopaminergic cells produced a long lasting motor improvement. This approach has the potential to make neural stem cell therapy acceptable and available to a large number of patients.”

Fetal Stem Cell Therapy Could Prove Fatal

An Israeli boy who suffers from a rare, often fatal genetic disease known as ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) has developed a tumor that was directly traced to the fetal stem cell therapy that he received. No known cure exists for A-T, which causes degeneration of the brain regions that control movement and speech, and people with the disease usually do not survive past their teens or twenties. Consequently, when the boy was 9 years old, his family traveled to Moscow so that he could receive an experimental therapy consisting of intracerebellar and intrathecal injections of human neural fetal stem cells – derived from aborted human fetuses – which were then injected into the boy’s brain and spinal cord as a treatment for his A-T. Even though he received two more treatments with the fetal stem cells at the ages of 10 and 12, he still had not shown any improvement by the age of 13 and in fact the severity of his disease had progressed to such an extent that he required a wheelchair. When he began having headaches, tests conducted at the Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv revealed a multifocal brain tumor pressing against both his brain stem and his spinal cord, which biopsy revealed to be a glioneural neoplasm. The tumor was surgically removed in 2006 when the boy was 14 years old, at which time cytogenetic and molecular analysis of the tumor revealed it to be of the same tissue as the fetal stem cells, and was therefore caused directly by the fetal stem cell therapy. Among other tests, genetic analysis revealed that some of the cells of the tumor had originated from a female donor and were comprised of 2 normal, healthy copies of the gene in which mutations cause the A-T disease, and which therefore did not match the boy’s own genotype containing abnormal copies of the gene.

Had this tumor not been discovered and surgically removed, it certainly would have been fatal and the boy would have died – not from the A-T disease, but from the therapy which was meant to treat the A-T disease. Indeed, one of the most serious concerns with embryonic and fetal stem cells is that they might constitute “therapies” which are worse than the diseases that they are meant to treat. This particular example with a boy suffering from A-T offers strong evidence to justify exactly such a concern. The boy is being closely monitored for any other tumors which might also possibly develop over time, as a lingering yet direct result of the fetal stem cell therapy that he received.

The formation of tumors has long been one of the main concerns associated with embryonic and fetal stem cells, and the fact that this boy’s tumor was not detected until 4 years after his first treatment raises some new concerns. According to Dr. Marius Wernig of Stanford University, “Stem cell transplantations have a humongous potential. But if people rush out there without really knowing what they’re doing, that really backfires and can bring this whole field to a halt.”

As Josephine Quintavale of the public interest group Comment on Reproductive Ethics adds, “The risks of tumor formation in association with embryonic stem cells are widely acknowledged and one reason why there are very serious concerns about the proposed use of such cells in treating spinal cord injury in the US. It would appear from this report that fetal stem cells are similarly unstable. These are not areas of therapy we should be rushing into, whatever the ethical debates surrounding the use of embryo or fetal tissue per se.”

Dr. Stephen Minger of King’s College London further explains, “This is worrying and we have to be cautious. We need to have long term monitoring and follow-up of the patients who are given stem cells and rigorous regulation of centres providing cell therapy. Although this is just one case, it does show that we need to be careful about the cell population we are using.”

As we have often explained on this website, all stem cells are not created equal, nor do they behave equally, and important distinctions must be made between the different types of stem cells. Generally speaking, all stem cells fall into 2 broad categories: adult stem cells, and everything else. The latter category includes embryonic and fetal stem cells, while stem cells that are derived from umbilical cord and placental blood are categorized as “adult” stem cells. The relatively recently discovered endometrial regenerative cells (ERCs), which have shown to be particularly promising, also fall into the category of “adult” stem cells. It is important to understand that adult stem cells behave very differently from embryonic and fetal stem cells, with one of the major differences being the risk of tumor formation, which has long been known to be inherently problematic in embryonic and fetal stem cells, especially in regard to the formation of teratomas (a specific type of tumor), which is the definitive requirement of pluripotency; by sharp contrast, however, adult stem cells do not cause tumors because adult stem cells are not pluripotent, but are instead multipotent, at best. In the past, the lack of pluripotency in adult stem cells was seen as a disadvantage, although increasingly it is being recognized as a distinct advantage, since it eliminates any danger of tumor formation.

According to a warning issued by Dr. John Gearhart, a stem cell scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, “Patients, please beware. Cells are not drugs. They can misbehave in so many different ways, it just is going to take a good deal of time.”

Although this particular case of tumor formation was originally reported in the PLoS medical journal, a peer-reviewed open access journal published by the Public Library of Science, the story was subsequently republished in all major media outlets around the world. As the authors of the PLoS paper cautiously conclude, “This is the first report of a human brain tumor complicating neural stem cell therapy. The findings here suggest that neuronal stem/progenitor cells may be involved in gliomagenesis and provide the first example of a donor-derived brain tumor. Further work is urgently needed to assess the safety of these therapies.”

Blindness Successfully Treated with Adult Stem Cells

For the average high school sophomore, learning to drive is a big deal. For 16-year-old Macie Morse, who just earned her learner’s permit and is now quite proficient behind the wheel of a car, the achievement is one that neither she nor anyone else in her family had ever thought would be possible. According to Macie, “It was one of the most exciting times of my entire 16 years.”

Having been born blind, until the age of 15 Macie had 20/4,000 vision in one eye and only light perception in the other eye. A visual score of 20/4,000 means that at a distance of 20 feet the person can see objects with as much clarity and visual acuity as the average person can see from a distance of 4,000 feet. The particular visual defect from which Macie suffered was optic nerve hypoplasia, which is an underdevelopment of the nerve that transmits visual signals from the eye to the brain. Unable even to read unless the print was within inches of her eye, Macie could only dream of participating fully in the world around her. As Macie puts it, “I’ve always wondered what it would be like to lay on the couch and watch TV. I always wondered what it would be like to see my friends.” According to Dr. James Thompson, optometrist and owner of Advanced Eye Care in Fort Collins, “If the optic nerve isn’t healthy, glasses aren’t going to do anything for anybody.”

Now, after having received adult stem cell therapy, Maci has 20/80 vision in one eye and 20/400 vision in the other, which is improved to 20/30 vision with a monocle.

Prior to Macie, only 10 other people had ever undergone the adult stem cell procedure for optic nerve hypoplasia, which costs $40,000, not counting travel expenses to and from the clinic in China where the therapy is administered. Raising money through a variety of sources throughout their local community, Macie and her mother were able to travel to China together so that Macie could have the therapy. Almost immediately, Macie showed dramatic improvement.

Legally, in order to be allowed to drive, one must have a minimum of 20/40 vision, a requirement which Macie now meets. According to her mother, “Before, I was always one step behind her, keeping an eye on her. Now I can let her be free. She’s going to be fine.”

Endometrial Regenerative Cells Inhibit Cancer

Researchers have announced a new and somewhat surprising discovery with the novel population of extremely promising adult stem cells known as endometrial regenerative cells (ERCs). Already recognized for their highly angiogenic properties, ERCs are currently in development as a treatment for critical limb ischemia, which is an advanced form of peripheral artery disease. Now, in a counter-intuitive turn of events, ERCs have also demonstrated a strong ability to inhibit angiogenesis in tumor growth.

ERCs share certain similarities with mesenchymal stem cells while also exhibiting unique surface markers, and the cells are highly superior in a number of characteristics such as growth factor production, differentiability and expandability. In this latest study, researchers examined the ability of unmanipulated ERCs to influence gliomal growth in a Sprague Dawley rat model. A glioma is a type of cancer that arises from glial cells and is therefore most commonly found in the brain though also less often in the spine.

In a paper entitled, “Inhabition of Intracranial Glioma Growth by Endometrial Regenerative Cells”, the scientists found that ERCs inhibit the growth of these types of tumors. In fact, regardless of the route of administration, the ERCs were observed to induce dramatic inhibition of the glioma, with a 49% reduction in volume after intravenous administration of the ERCs and a 46% reduction in volume following intratumoral administration. In both cases, both an inhibition of angiogenesis as well as a reduction in the number of CD133+ cells were associated with the diminished intracranial tumor growth.

Such findings suggest a number of intriguing possibilities, such as, for example, an association between the strong anti-inflammatory properties of ERCs and the conceptual model of cancer in which tumor stem cells are thought to be triggered to enter the cell cycle as a result of cellular injury, which usually precipitates an inflammatory response. Although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the behavior of ERCs have yet to be fully elucidated, they nevertheless offer a number of new and promising therapeutic modalities.

As the authors explain in their paper, “Despite the angiogenic potential of ERCs in the hindlimb ischemia model, these data support a paradoxical tumor inhibitory activity of ERCs. Further studies are needed to determine the qualitative differences between physiological angiogenesis, which seems to be supported by ERCs, and tumor angiogenesis which appeared to be inhibited.”

Geron’s Efforts in Europe are Thwarted

The embryonic stem cell company Geron is not allowed to enter the European market due to a questionable patent.

The European Patent Office has upheld an earlier decision to reject a patent application for the use of embryonic stem cells as filed by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation in 1995. When Dr. James Thomson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison became the first person to isolate an embryonic stem cell in the late 1990s, much of his funding came from the Geron Corporation. Consequently, today Geron holds the worldwide license for the technology developed by Dr. Thomson and his colleagues.

In its response to the European Patent Office decision, Geron filed a form with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Friday in which the company claims that “the applicability of this decision to such lines is uncertain.”

Geron has recently dominated the news because of the authorization that it has received from the U.S. FDA to begin the first clinical trials ever to be conducted with human embryonic stem cells. The clinical trials willl test the company’s product, known as GRNOPC1, which consists of live human embryonic stem cells, in the treatment of spinal cord injuries. The purpose of Phase I clinical trials is to test safety, whereas efficacy tests will be conducted later in subsequent clinical trials, assuming that safety can be proven, although this remains the subject of widespread speculation.

The SEC filing follows a secondary stock offering by the company on Thursday, at which time Geron conducted what investors are calling a “conveniently timed” public offering, after the close of the stock markets, of 7.25 million shares at $6.60 per share, significantly below Thursday’s closing price of $7.77 per share. The 12% discount grossed Geron approximately $43 million. Following the public offering, Geron is now in a goverment-mandated quiet period, during which time it is not allowed to speak to the press.

In the U.S., a number of unanswered questions remain in regard to Geron’s upcoming clinical trial. Geron will not even be able to begin enrolling patients in its small Phase I clinical trial until the summer of 2009, since the company has not yet received final clearance from the hospitals in which the trial will be conducted. Only ten patients will participate in the trial, but Geron is required to wait a full month between each patient due to the serious safety concerns that are associated with embryonic stem cells. Assuming that Geron will be able to enroll one patient per month – an assumption which has been questioned by many experts in the field – the study will not be fully enrolled until the middle of 2010 at the earliest. Additionally, since Geron must complete a full year of treatment for each patient, data will not be available until 2011. A number of investors have shorted Geron’s stock, having lost confidence in the company as a consequence of the years that it devoted to cancer vaccines and to telomerase-based drugs with no tangible results to show for the effort, two prime examples of which were Geron’s prostate cancer vaccine which dominated the news in 2003 and which has long since been buried and forgotten, in addition to Geron’s telomerase-inhibitor cancer drug known as GRN163L which seemed promising in 2007 and which temporarily drove up the stock price, but which ultimately yielded only disappointing data.

Geron’s stock plummeted 16.7%, or $1.30, to $6.47 during midday trading on Friday.

Osiris Demonstrates Exceptional Performance of Adult Stem Cell Product in Clinical Trial

The company Osiris Therapeutics, which is focused exclusively on the development of adult stem cell therapies, not embryonic stem cell therapies, today reported the final data from its two-year-long Phase I clinical trial in which one of its adult stem cell products, Prochymal, was evaluated for safety and preliminary efficacy in the treatment of heart attack. The double-blind, placebo-controlled study consisted of 53 participants who had suffered acute myocardial infarction (MI), all of whom were fully immunocompetent patients, and none of whom exhibited any signs of adverse immune response or infusional toxicities from the Prochymal. In fact, Prochymal demonstrated even greater safety than a placebo, since the patients who received the placebo instead of Prochymal exhibited a higher rate of adverse events. For the patients who received Prochymal instead of a placebo, Prochymal resulted in the improvement of a number of parameters including a drop in repeat hospitalizations as well as significant improvement in cardiac function and reduced incidents of cardiac arrhythmia. Not only did the clinical trial met its primary endpoint for demonstrating the safety of Prochymal in an acute MI setting, but in all aspects Prochymal has exhibited an extremely favorable safety profile. Additionally, experts describe the procedure as being so simple that even community hospitals could easily adopt the protocol.

Data from this ground-breaking adult stem cell therapeutic product indicate that Prochymal does indeed expedite patient recovery from heart trauma, which previously has always been extremely difficult to treat with much success. According to the president and CEO of Osiris Therapeutics, Dr. C. Randall Mills, “This study adds convincing long-term data to the excellent safety profile of Prochymal, having now treated hundreds of patients in trials over the past decade. We are excited that Prochymal demonstrated strong evidence of efficacy beyond the best cardiac care available today. We are now advancing this program into a larger Phase II trial, focusing on patients with more severe heart damage.”

Osiris is developing its Prochymal therapy in collaboration with Genzyme, with whom Osiris formed a strategic alliance last year for the development and commercialization of Prochymal, and for which enrollment was recently completed in a Phase III clinical trial for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease. Additionally, in January Osiris received FDA approval to broaden its expanded access program for Prochymal, which is a proprietary preparation of mesenchymal stem cells that are derived from the bone marrow of healthy adult donors and specifically formulated for intravenous infusion.

According to Dr. Timothy Henry, director of research at the Minneapolis Heart Institue Foundation at Abbott Northwestern, “This placebo-controlled study was truly the first of its kind and the data produced are promising. It clearly suggests that allogeneic adult stem cells have significant potential to improve recovery following a heart attack and can prevent long-term adverse effects. Given the fact that we can administer this drug through a standard I.V. in an acute setting, Prochymal could become an integral part of standard-of-care for the treatment of heart attacks everywhere.”

Osiris is focused on the treatment of a variety of inflammatory, orthopedic and cardiovascular diseases. As described on their website, “Prochymal is currently being evaluated in Phase III trials for steroid refractory GvHD, acute GvHD, and Crohn’s disease. Prochymal has been granted Fast Track status by the FDA for all three of these indications. Prochymal also obtained Orphan Drug status by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency for GvHD. Prochymal is being studied in Phase II trials for the treatment of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), type 1 diabetes, and acute myocardial infarction. Additionally, the U.S. Depaartment of Defense recently awarded Osiris a contract to develop Prochymal as a treatment for acute radiation syndrome.”

Osiris Therapeutics is the leading stem cell therapeutic company in the world, involved in the research and development of therapeutic products that are based exclusively upon adult stem cells, not embryonic stem cells.