High School Coach Heads to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy

Diagnosed in 2005 with multiple sclerosis, Sam Herrell had few options available to him in the U.S., his home country. Now, however, he is traveling to Central America in order to receive an adult stem cell therapy that was pioneered by American doctors but which is not yet available within the United States.

A proud native of Texas, the Ennis Lions football coach has decided to travel to ICM – the Institute for Cellular Medicine – in Central America for treatment with his own adult stem cells. The ICM has an 80% success rate with its patients, but don’t expect the treatment to be available any time soon within the U.S., since the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has made such a procedure legally impossible for doctors to conduct within the United States. Specifically, the FDA has decreed that autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells must be classified and regulated as a "drug", and therefore cannot be used as a clinical therapy until first being subjected to the ordinary FDA laws that govern pharmaceutically manufactured drugs, which is a process that typically requires a decade or more of testing before approval can be obtained. Most patients, with multiple sclerosis as well as other diseases or injuries, cannot wait a decade or longer for treatment, so they are following the U.S. doctors who have set up their clinics outside of U.S. borders. If the FDA would only change their stance on this critically important issue, then the U.S. doctors who pioneered this adult stem cell treatment would be able to administer the therapy within the U.S., and then perhaps there wouldn’t be such an endless debate over embryonic stem cells, which still have years if not decades left before they could be considered for use in clinical therapies. Unlike embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells are already being used in clinics around the world to treat real people with real diseases – but not within the U.S., except for the very limited number of FDA-approved clinical trials that are being conducted.

As Sam Herrell explains, "The thing that’s kind of disappointing is that the neurologists here have nothing that really gives you much hope. All they can do is say keep on this medication and hope it slows down, hope it doesn’t overtake your whole nervous sytsem before they find a cure. Outside the U.S., some things are being done that people have had phenomenal results with, and that’s been encouraging. I really think there’s going to be a cure for it – that’s what I’m hoping for. It’s been encouraging to hear those stories and talk with people."

A number of scientific studies in the medical literature support such claims, not the least of which is an article that was published in the Journal of Translational Medicine in April of 2009, entitled, "Non-expanded adipose stromal vascular fraction cell therapy for multiple sclerosis", by N.H. Riordan et al., in which scientists and doctors elucidate the various cellular and molecular mechanisms that are at work when this type of autologous adult stem cell therapy is implemented as a treatment for multiple sclerosis. Additionally, 3 case studies are described in the paper in which patients with multiple sclerosis showed significant improvement after receiving such a treatment. Of particular significance are the unique immunomodulatory properties of this therapy, which play an especially vital role in a disorder of autoimmune origin such as multiple sclerosis.

In specific reference to ICM, Mr. Herrell adds, "I’ve heard of two different procedures I really think I’ll try. It’s very expensive, but that’s a hurdle I can try to tackle for hope of a cure. I get excited when I talk to those people who have gone outside the country, because they’ve come back with a story of hope. I’m still hopeful for a cure. I’m serious about that. These people who have tried some of these things, they don’t feel better, they feel cured. That’s what I’m hoping for. Then I can still live in Texas."

However, the U.S. FDA still insists that the cells within a person’s own body are "drugs" and therefore cannot be administered, not even to that very same person, for therapeutic purposes until first being subjected to the exact same multi-year, multi-million dollar approval process by which the pharmaceutical industry is regulated. Unless the FDA ever changes its position on this issue, people such as Sam Herrell will be forced to travel outside of the U.S. in order to be treated with their own, autologous adult stem cells.

Fortunately, at least such therapy does exist somewhere in the world, even though not in the United States.

Boston’s biotech community leads wave of stem cell consolidation, deal making

Today at the ISSCR Meeting in Barcelona, the merger of two stem cell companies, IZumi Bio and Pierian Inc was announced, with the new company being named IPierian. According to the new company’s website iPierian is

"…a pioneering biopharmaceutical company that is taking the cutting-edge technologies of cellular reprogramming and directed differentiation to an entirely new level to harness the power of induced pluripotent stem cells to advance the understanding of human diseases and accelerate the discovery of more effective therapeutics for patients"

The two precursor companies, iZumi and Pierian, both had synergistic skills in the area of inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPS), a type of "artificial stem cell" that is created from skin or other tissues. The use of iPS cells for therapeutics development is more attractive to scientists than embryonic stem cells for several reasons. Firstly, iPS cells can be generated to be patient-specific, thus overcoming problems with need for taking of immune suppressants. Currently embryonic stem cells can not be used in patients for several reasons, and the few times that their use is contemplated, the patient is sentenced to taking life-long immune suppression so that they do not undergo rejection. Secondly, iPS cells can be generated under highly defined conditions. Embryonic stem cells that are currently used have been developed years ago and face various problems such as the fact that many of them have previously been grown on mouse cells or using animal products. In contrast, iPS cells can be generated with relatively little effort.

iZumi was supported by the venture capital groups Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and LExington, Mass.-based Highland Capital Partners with a $20 million investment, whereas Pierian was founded by MPM Capital managing directors Ashley Dombkowski and Robert Millman as well as Harvard University scientists. The new company, which will be led by John Walker as CEO and Corey Goodman, as Chairman, raised an additional $10 million from Boston-based MPM Capital and $1.5 million from FinTech Capital Partners.

Initial goals of the company will be use of the iPS cells to address disease affecting the central nervous system that have no effective treatment such as spinal muscular atrophy, Parkinson’s Disease, and ALS. In the long-run the company plans to investigate conditions such as heart failure, liver failure, and diabetes. As part of the new company’s strategy, it will seek synergistic collaborations with established market players.

Despite the aggressive goals the company has set for itself, there are several drawbacks that one must consider. Firstly, pluripotent stem cells, regardless of whether they are iPS or embryonic stem cells, all cause cancer when administered into animals. iPS may be especially dangerous since oncogenes (genes that cause cancer) are needed for the creation of these cells. In order for iPS to be used safely, it will be necessary to make sure that the cells being made for injection are completely the cells that one wants, and no contamination with the original iPS cells. In other words, if one is treating Parkinson’s Disease, one can not simply inject iPS cells into the area of the brain that is damaged, since this conceptually will form a tumor. In contrast, one would have to "teach" the iPS cells to become the specific cell that is damaged in Parkinson’s Disease, called the "dopaminergic neuron", one will have to concentrate these cells outside of the body, and then inject them directly where they are needed. Once the cells are injected, they will have to form connections with the existing cells and subsequently integrate and take over their function. This is in contrast to the present-day clinically available adult stem cell therapies, where in many cases adult stem cells are injected either intraviously or intrathecally, and the natural signals of the body instruct them to differentiate into the needed tissue. Although differentiation efficacy of adult stem cells may be lower on a per cell basis, of the thousands of people that have been treated with adult stem cells no reports of tumor formation exist.

iPierian’s scientific leadership comes from the respected embryonic stem cell experts Dr. George Daley, Douglas Melton and Lee Rubin who are faculty at Harvard. The scientific advisory board (SAB) of the company will be chaired by Dr. George Daley, and will include Amy Wagers, Kevin Eggan, Benoit Bruneau, and Matthias Hebrok.

Adult Stem Cells Treat Diabetes

Prochymal, the adult stem cell product derived from bone marrow and developed by Osiris Therapeutics, is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of type I diabetes. The double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-site Phase II clinical trials have a target enrollment of 60 patients, each one of whom will receive 3 infusions over a period of 2 months.

Prochymal has been shown to protect the pancreas from the type of autoimmune attack that characterizes type I diabetes, thereby allowing the natural production of insulin. Patients in the trial have been able to reduce the amount of externally administered and prescribed insulin as their pancreas begin producing its own insulin.

According to Dr. Aaron Vinik of the U.S., "This is a very exciting discovery. When people get told they have diabetes, it comes as a tremendous shock. They have to live with having to take insulin injections for the rest of their lives. In the future, we will have a cure that will stop the disease in its tracks."

Prochymal is a proprietary adult stem cell product, the active ingredient in which is mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that are derived from healthy adult volunteer donors and formulated for intravenous infusion. Embryonic, fetal, and animal tissue are not involved. Prochymal has already been tested in over 1,000 patients in previous clinical trials with no adverse side effects.

In addition to these Phase II clinical trials for type I diabetes, Prochymal is also currently in Phase III clinical trials for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), Crohn’s disease, and it is being developed for the repair of cardiac tissue following a heart attack as well as for the repair of lung tissue in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Prochymal is the only stem cell therapeutic product currently designated both by the FDA and by the European Medicines Agency as both an Orphan Drug and as a Fast Track product. Osiris is also developing another adult stem cell product, Chondrogen, which is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

A leader in adult stem cell therapies, Osiris Therapeutics is focused on the development of products for the treatment of inflammatory, orthopedic and cardiovascular diseases. In November of last year, Osiris formed a strategic alliance with the biotech company Genzyme that was valued at over $1.3 billion. In 2007, the two companies were awarded a $224.7 million contract from the U.S. Department of Defense for the development of Prochymal in the treatment of radiation sickness. (Please see the related news article on this website, entitled, "Genzyme and Osiris Form Adult Stem Cell Mega-Partnership", dated November 5, 2008).

Heart Stem Cells Heal Heart

When Ken Milles suffered a heart attack at the age of 39, he was not given a very encouraging prognosis from his doctor. As Ken describes, "When he told me that there was permanent damage and that the duration of my life was reduced, that freaked me out."

A construction worker and father of two teenaged sons, Ken is now the first patient to volunteer in a clinical trial at the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute in Los Angeles. One of 24 patients in the study, Ken is the first person to be treated with his own heart-derived adult stem cells.

Adult stem cells are believed to reside in all tissue types throughout the body, with each type of adult stem cell being highly specialized in producing the corresponding specific type of tissue. Some organs, such as the heart, are known to contain very small amounts of their own stem cells, but nevertheless a specialized cardiac stem cell is known to exist in the adult human heart, throughout life and into old age. The low number of naturally occurring, endogenous cardiac stem cells, however, is not usually enough to repair serious damage to heart tissue, such as that which results from myocardial infarction. But when these cardiac stem cells are isolated, cultured and expanded in the laboratory, they can be readministered to the patient in quantities that are large enough to repair even severe damage. This is exactly what Ken’s doctors are doing.

As Dr. Eduardo Marban, the leader of the study, describes, "We seek to actually reverse the injury that has been caused by the heart attack, by regrowing new heart muscle to at least partially replace the scar that’s formed. These cells that we’re putting in come from the heart itself, and are predestined to generate heart muscle and blood vessels."

Derived from a tiny sample of healthy heart tissue, the cardiac stem cells are expanded in the laboratory to 25 million stem cells, which then develop into the spherical, multicellular structures known as cardiospheres which have been found in previous clinical and preclinical trials to regenerate damaged cardiac tissue. In fact, Dr. Marban was involved in similar studies at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in 2005, at which time he reported that, "The findings could potentially offer patients use of their own stem cells to repair heart tissue soon after a heart attack, or to regenerate weakened muscle resulting from heart failure, perhaps averting the need for heart transplants. By using a patient’s own adult stem cells rather than a donor’s, there would be no risk of triggering an immune response that could cause rejection."

The doctors inject the stem cells through an artery directly into the damaged tissue of the patient’s heart. Within 6 months, signs of tissue repair should become evident.

As Ken Milles has said, "If this works, it’s gonna help so many people. It’s gonna change everything."

The clinical trials will continue for the next 3 to 4 years.

Texas Woman Travels to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Treatment

In order to treat her multiple sclerosis, Ann Lacy is traveling to a clinic in Central America for adult stem cell therapy. Currently she is in the process of raising approximately $35,000 for her trip, which will cover not only the cost of the therapy itself but also related travel expenses. The therapy is not eligible for insurance coverage, even though this particular clinic, the Institute for Cellular Medicine (ICM), boasts an 80% success rate in treating its patients.

The reporter for this particular news report as it appeared in the Tri County Leader states that, "The treatment has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and studies on the effectiveness of this therapy are virtually nonexistent."

In fact, while the first half of that sentence is true, the second half is not. Numerous studies have already been reported in the medical literature which do, indeed, document both the safety and the efficacy of this therapy, such as, for example, the article entitled, "Non-expanded adipose stromal vascular fraction cell therapy for multiple sclerosis", by N.H. Riordan et al., which was published in the Journal of Translational Medicine on April 24, 2009 and which meticulously documents 3 clinical case reports of multiple sclerosis patients who were treated with this type of autologous adult stem cell therapy and who subsequently showed dramatic improvement. Additionally, numerous other reports in the conventional, peer-reviewed medical literature also exist on the topic of adult stem cells, especially mesenchymal stem cells, as a treatment for multiple sclerosis, which any simple search of the medical literature would immediately reveal. To say that "studies on the effectiveness of this therapy are virtually nonexistent" is merely to advertise one’s ignorance of the topic, since such a statement is egregiously false.

The first half of the sentence, unfortunately, is very true: namely, such therapies have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA approval process is notoriously a very lengthy and expensive one, typically lasting a decade or longer and costing millions of dollars, even under the best of circumstances. In this particular instance, however, the prospect of ever getting autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cell therapy approved by the FDA is further complicated by the fact that the FDA has specifically outlawed such a procedure in the United States. In other words, the FDA has decreed that each person’s own endogenous, naturally occurring adult stem cells are "drugs" and therefore must be regulated as such, and therefore cannot be clinically administered as therapies in the U.S. – not even to the same person from whom the cells were obtained – until having first been subjected to the multi-year, multi-million dollar federal governmental approval process. It is this stance by the FDA on autologous adult stem cells – not any restrictions on the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research – which is the primary obstacle to stem cell therapies in the United States. Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research has continued in previous years with private funding, yet hESCs still have at least another decade to go before they can be considered safe enough for clinical use, according to expert consensus among the hESC scientific community. Meanwhile, adult stem cell therapies are already in use throughout the world, in almost every country except the U.S., because of this ruling by the U.S. FDA. Only in the U.S. are a person’s own tissues and cells considered to be "drugs".

A number of grass-roots organizations have been formed in response to the FDA’s stance, which include the physician-based American Stem Cell Therapy Association (ASCTA) and the patient-based "Safe Stem Cells Now!". More information on these organizations is available at their websites, www.stemcelldocs.org and www.safestemcells.org, respectively.

As Dr. Christopher Centeno, founding CEO of the adult stem cell company Regenerative Sciences, and one of the founders of the ASCTA, has stated, "While the Obama administration seems to have opened the embryonic stem cell door, their FDA seems to want to slam the adult stem cell door shut."

(Please see the related news articles on this website, entitled, "Arizona Man Travels to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy", dated July 16, 2009; "Bangor Family Heads to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy", dated July 8, 2009; and "Two U.S. Adult Stem Cell Companies Form Collaboration in Asia", dated May 11, 2009).

Aastrom Resumes Clinical Trial Following FDA Clearance

The adult stem cell company Aastrom Biosciences has resumed patient enrollment in its Phase II clinical trial, entitled IMPACT-DCM, in which autologous adult stem cells are being used to treat dilated cardiomyopathy, an end-stage form of chronic, congestive heart failure. The study had been suspended on May 22 when a patient in the trial died. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has now concluded that the death of the patient was unrelated to the clinical trial.

On May 22 it was announced that the clinical trial was suspended when a patient who was enrolled in the trial unexpectedly died after having been treated with autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells and released from the hospital. The FDA then imposed a halt on the clinical trial, at which time Aastrom temporarily suspended further patient enrollment and treatment until the cause of death could be determined. Having completed its formal investigation, the FDA has now concluded that the cause of the patient’s death was unrelated to the clinical trial itself, but instead was merely caused by the advanced stage of the patient’s own dilated cardiomyopathy. Since the clinical trial was specifically designed to treat dilated cardiomyopathy, this disease was required as a preexisting condition for enrollment in the clinical trial, although some patients who were enrolled had more advanced and severe forms of this condition than others.

Fourteen people have been enrolled in the study thus far, which has a target enrollment of 40 patients. The dilated cardiomyopathy study is not Aastrom’s only clinical trial currently underway, however, as Aastrom is also conducting a Phase IIb clinical trial for the treatment of critical limb ischemia, an advanced form of peripheral artery disease, which is also being treated with autologous adult stem cells. According to the Aastrom’s website, "The Company’s proprietary Tissue Repair Cell (TRC) technology involves the use of a patient’s own cells to manufacture products to treat a range of chronic diseases and serious injuries. Aastrom’s TRC-based products contain increased numbers of stem and early progenitor cells, produced from a small amount of bone marrow collected from the patient." Aastrom describes itself as a "Regenerative medicine company developing personalized cell-based therapies to slow or reverse the course of chronic diseases." As stated on their website, "Aastrom’s TRC products have been used in over 325 patients, and are currently in clinical trials for cardiac, vascular and bone tissue regeneration applications, with plans to expand into the neural therapeutic area."

Headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Aastrom is focused exclusively on therapies that are developed from autologous adult stem cells, not embryonic stem cells.

Aastrom’s stock price climbed 21.8% following today’s news announcement by the FDA.

Adult Stem Cell Companies Seen as Profitable Investment

While religious groups debate the various ethical issues of embryonic versus adult stem cells, and researchers debate the various scientific issues, financial analysts are not debating at all. From a purely monetary perspective, it is adult stem cells, not embryonic stem cells, which constitute a sound investment.

As the authors of today’s article point out, "Amid controversies over embryonic stem cell research, drugs using adult cells are already bearing fruit." As the authors continue to explain, "When it comes to stem cells, the public – and the media – tend to focus on embryos. But researchers and analysts say marketable therapies already are emerging from less controversial work with adult stem cells."

Such a fact is hardly a secret, as scientists and physicians have been trying to tell the world for years that adult stem cell therapies already exist, while embryonic stem cell therapies do not, and probably will not for at least another decade. Such information is often "translated" through the filters of the media, however, many members of whom seem to be heavily biased toward the word "embryonic". Apparently it takes a financial perspective to convey the point that adult stem cells are scientifically and medically viable as human therapies, whereas embryonic stem cells are not. As the authors of today’s investment article explain, "Adult cells make up the lion’s share of the stem cell space, mainly because they are easier to come by than embryonic cells, and less expensive to run in clinical trials. They are also derived from mature tissue, like bone marrow or umbilical cord blood, so they avoid the ethical debate that surrounds embryonic stem cells."

The authors go on to point out that adult stem cells can "combat a variety of maladies from diabetes to heart disease", and "In fact, adult stem cells are currently the only type of stem cells used in transplants to treat diseases, such as cancers like leukemia. Furthermore, researchers are far closer to commercializing drugs based on adult stem cells than any product based on embryonic stem cells." Such medical and scientific advances did not suddenly happen overnight, but in fact have been going on for years. Where have you been, members of the media???

Ethics and politics aside, the scientific differences between embryonic and adult stem cells are numerous and significant, which is precisely why financial analysts are cautioning investors to heed the differences when it comes to market and monetary considerations. One financial guru in particular, Robin Young, a medical industry analyst with RRY Publications, has estimated that gross sales of adult stem cell therapies will surpass $100 million in the U.S. alone, just in 2009. In less than a decade, by 2018, Mr. Young has calculated that revenue from adult stem cell therapies could exceed $8.2 billion. Embryonic stem cells, by contrast, are not expected to advance beyond the laboratory stage for at least another decade, at the earliest, due to the numerous inherent problems that plague embryonic stem cells, not the least of which is their strong tendency to form teratomas – a particularly hideous type of tumor that contains teeth, hair, bones and bodily organs in a grossly disorganized fashion, like a disassembled and randomly rearranged human embryo. Even Dr. James Thomson, the world authority on embryonic stem cells, repeatedly emphasizes the point that embryonic stem cells are notoriously problematic in the laboratory and therefore will require at least another decade of research before being safe enough to be considered clinically viable as therapies. As "the father of embryonic stem cell science", and the first person who ever isolated an embryonic stem cell in the laboratory, Dr. Thomson certainly knows what he’s talking about, although most members of the media seem uninterested in such a dismal prospect for embryonic stem cells, so the disadvantages of these highly volatile and dangerous stem cells are rarely reported. But for anyone who may be interested either in being treated as a patient with stem cells, or in investing money in stem cells, the scientific realities become immediately relevant and important. While such realities are certainly discouraging for embryonic stem cells, they are highly encouraging for adult stem cells. As stated in today’s article, "Indeed, several pharmaceutical companies are now taking notice of research advancements in adult stem cells – and their proximity to reaching the market."

According to Debra Grega, executive director of the Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, "Adult-derived cells are the ones that have been studied for the past 10 to 15 years and are ready for prime time. Large pharmaceutical companies are now wanting to get into the adult stem cell therapeutic area. That indicates to me that there is enough safety and enough efficacy that they are willing to put money in."

By sharp contrast, as the authors of today’s article point out, "The California-based outfit Geron dominates the embryonic market, and is perhaps 10 years away from commercializing a spinal cord treatment based on its research."

Another example of the momentum behind adult stem cell therapies is found in the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer which announced in November of last year that it would invest $100 million in regenerative medicine research over a 3 to 5 year period, with a strong emphasis on adult stem cells. Additionally, as the authors of today’s article explain, "The frontrunner in the adult stem cell space is Osiris Therapeutics. Last year, the biotech Genzyme paid Osiris $130 million up front, with another $1.2 billion to be paid in potential milestones, to develop two new adult stem cell treatments. Osiris’s star drug Prochymal is used to fight graft-versus-host disease, a painful illness that can afflict transplant recipients. Osiris says the FDA could approve the drug within a year. If successful, Osiris would be the first company to win approval for a stem cell drug."

Among other adult stem cell companies mentioned in today’s article are Stem Cells Inc., Cytori, and Aastrom Biosciences, all of which are described as "moving forward in the adult stem cell space."

As the authors conclude, "And so while there’s just one star in the embryonic stem cell universe, a whole constellation of adult stem cell drugs could be just around the corner."

Rather than having to wait another entire decade, or longer, for what may or may not even be a profitable return on one’s investment in the embryonic stem cell field, a wiser investment strategy would target any of the numerous companies that already have adult stem cell therapies in FDA-approved clinical trials, and which are moving increasingly closer to legal commercialization in a virtually unlimited market which is entirely untapped.

Autism Treated With Adult Stem Cells

Judy DiCorcia of New York has written an open letter to President Obama in which she describes the improvement of her 10-year-old autistic daughter, Lauren, after adult stem cell therapy was administered to the child at the XCell-Center in Cologne, Germany.

The treatment, which cost approximately $10,000, took place in January of this year and consisted of a simple procedure in which adult stem cells were extracted from the girl’s own bone marrow and then readministered via a lumbar puncture in the girl’s spine. The technique was quick, simple and minimally invasive.

According to the girl’s mother, Lauren has shown significant improvement in a number of ways, including being able to sleep through the night for the first time in the girl’s life. Not quite half a year after the treatment, Ms. DiCorcia now reports that "Lauren is doing well. I would have to say that she plateaued at about the 12-week mark. Her situation is stable and fortunately all positive effects have persisted. I wish the doctor could fly to the U.S. and perform the therapy here!"

The XCell-Center is a private clinical group and institute for regenerative medicine which operates two treatment centers, one in Cologne and one in Dusseldorf, Germany. It is the first privately owned medical center in Europe to specialize in regenerative medicine. In addition to providing autologous adult stem cell therapies to patients, the XCell-Center is also actively involved in pre-clinical and clinical research. Since January of 2007, more than 1,600 patients have been treated with their own adult stem cells at the XCell-Center.

As stated on their website, the XCell-Center "is the first private institute worldwide to hold an official license for the extraction and approval of stem cell material for autologous treatment." Since only adult stem cells are used at the XCell-Center, not embryonic stem cells, the treatments are ethically noncontroversial and scientifically proven to be medically safe. Since only autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells are used, there is no risk of immune rejection. The XCell-Center operates in full accordance with German law and European guidelines. The specialized team of physicians at the XCell-Center includes neurosurgeons, cardiologists, hematologists, orthopedists, radiologists and pharmacologists. In addition to autism, the XCell-Center also treats a number of other medical conditions which include stroke, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injuries, orthopedic injuries, ischemic heart disease, peripheral artery disease, diabetes and complications thereof, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and other degenerative illnesses.

The XCell-Center boasts an international advisory board and is a member of the German Society for Regenerative Medicine. Its headquarters are located at the Dominikus hospital in Dusseldorf, while its second branch is located at the Eduardus Hospital’s Institute of Regenerative Medicine in Cologne.

As explicitly stated on the website of the XCell-Center, "therapy with embryonic stem cells is strictly prohibited in Germany. At the XCell-Center, we only use the patient’s own stem cells for therapy." The strict prohibition of embryonic stem cell therapy in Germany, as in many other countries, is based not so much on ethical concerns but on concrete scientific reasons, not the least of which is the fact that embryonic stem cells are medically unsafe. In addition to causing teratomas (a specific type of tumor), embryonic stem cells are notorious for their numerous other inherent problems which disqualify them for any type of clinical therapeutic use.

Back in the U.S., Lauren’s mother, Ms. DiCorcia, wishes that this type of adult stem cell therapy were available in the U.S., so that she wouldn’t have to travel to Germany for her child’s treatment. Unfortunately, however, adult stem cell therapies, such as these that are being used with such success in Germany, which already exist and which are already being used in clinics around the world, would be available in the U.S. were it not for the fact that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has outlawed such therapies by designating each person’s own adult stem cells as a "drug" which therefore must be regulated by the same laws that apply to the giant pharmaceutical companies that manufacture prescription medication. Consequently, it is this stance by the FDA which is forcing all adult stem cell physicians to relocate outside of the U.S., where they set up their clinics in any and every other country on earth except the United States.

Ms. DiCorcia’s open letter to the President of the United States is reproduced herein:

"Dear President Obama,

I am the mother of a 10-year-old autistic daughter. In January, we took Lauren to Cologne, Germany for adult stem cell therapy. The center used her own stem cells drawn from her hip bone marrow, centrifuged the next day, and then reinserted via lumbar puncture the following day (2.95 million cells). Both procedures were quick and not invasive at all. In the past 6 weeks we have seen significant improvements in our daughter’s behaviors, focus, hyperactivity, and insomnia. I would rate a general improvement of about 40% – this is HUGE for a family living with autism. Our daughter started sleeping through the night for the first time (yes, she is 10 and got up every night) since stem cells. Lauren is happier just in her own skin – so much less frustrated and just generally happier. She is getting through her one-on-one therapy more quickly, better focused, and more compliant. Of course, it amazes me that this simple, non-controversial therapy cannot be done here in the United States.

Sincerely,

Judy DiCorcia"

Cellular Dynamics and Mount Sinai Sign Licensing Agreement

Cellular Dynamics International (CDI), the startup company formed by Dr. James Thomson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, has signed a licensing agreement with Mount Sinai Medical School in New York City.

The exclusive licensing agreement will allow CDI to produce cardiac cells with technology that was originally developed by Dr. Gordon Keller, who served as a professor of gene and cell medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) from 1999 to 2006, and after whom the Keller Laboratory at MSSM is named. Currently Dr. Keller directs the McEwen Centre for Regenerative Medicine at the University Health Network in Toronto. The license will allow for the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into cardiovascular progenitor cells which can then be further differentiated into more specialized cell lineages such as cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells. The various cardiac cells would then be used for pharmacological drug screening.

CDI, which Dr. Thomson and 3 of his colleagues founded in 2004, has already been selling heart cells to Roche and a number of other pharmaceutical companies for the toxicity testing of drugs. This new licensing agreement significantly increases CDI’s patent portfolio.

This is not the first licensing agreement between CDI and an academic institution, although it is the first that CDI has formally disclosed. The agreement is considered to be unique in a number of ways, not the least of which is its exclusivity, a condition which is rarely granted by academic institutions and which is thought to have cost CDI consideraly more than a nonexclusive licensing agreement would have cost. A senior representative of CDI indicated that the announcement of further licensing agreements could be expected in the near future.

According to Dr. W. Patrick McGrath, executive director of MSSM’s Office of Technology and Business Development (OTBD), "The Mount Sinai School of Medicine is pleased that CDI has selected MSSM’s technology for the production and use of cardiomyocytes and other cardiac cells. OTBD believes that CDI is well qualified to take the final steps to commercially develop MSSM’s translational research into products and services that will benefit the drug development process and, ultimately, cardiac patients worldwide."

As Chris Kendrick-Parker, chief commercialization officer and one of the vice presidents of CDI, adds, "We believe that CDI’s pluripotent stem cell technology will be the pharmaceutical industry’s platform of choice for identifying drug candidates and their probability of success in predictive toxicology. This exclusive license provides CDI complete freedom to operate in our quest to efficiently and effectively produce and provide cardiomyocytes and other cardiac cells for screening purposes. Furthermore, this license strengthens our growing patent portfolio and makes us a preferred collaborator and provider to pharma and biotech companies developing predictive toxicology tools to aid the industry."

As Dr. Thomson has often explained in the past, the most immediate application of pluripotent stem cells is not so much in cell-based therapies for the treatment of actual diseases and injuries, but rather in drug testing and development. Until a number of scientific obstacles are overcome, merely one of which is the danger of teratoma (tumor) formation, pluripotent stem cells carry too many risks to be used as actual clinical therapies. Pluripotent stem cells include not only embryonic stem cells but also the more recently developed iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cells, which, by official definition of pluripotency, are required to form teratomas. Adult stem cells, by sharp contrast, which are multipotent instead of pluripotent, do not, by definition, carry any risk of teratoma formation.

As Mr. Kendrick-Parker further explains, "This gives us multiple methods to arrive at the end goal of making fully functional terminal tissues from pluripotent cells, and really gives us the freedom to operate through a variety of methods to generate large quantities of cardiomyocytes as a tool. We’ve tried to basically create a portfolio of patents that allows us to use the most efficient means necessary to arrive at those cell types, and to have choices to arrive at the best population of cells for our customers. This helps us make sure that we have a marked advantage in this area, and that our customers know that when they do business with us they are unencumbered."

Curiously, a certain amount of ambiguity seems to have been built into this news announcement, as neither this nor other related news articles specify the exact source of these newly generated cardiac cells. In other words, nowhere was it mentioned whether the cardiac cells are to be generated from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or from induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, the latter of which are of adult somatic cell origin. Similarly, the news announcement as posted on the website of CDI merely states that the newly generated cardiac cells are produced from "human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs)", which could be either of embryonic or of adult cell origin, and even the company’s official announcement also stops short of specifying the precise source of these hPSCs. However, a further examination of the description of "human cardiac cytotoxicity screening" on CDI’s website reveals that these hPSCs are of adult, not embryonic, cell origin, as they are derived from iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cells, not from embryonic stem cells. More precisely, the CDI website displays the following statement: "CDI’s cardiomyocytes are differentiated from hPSCs that are reprogrammed to their pluripotent state from adult cells, thus avoiding the controversial and ethical issues surrounding embryonic stem cells." This is further verified by Mr. Kendrick-Parker’s statement that, "There are a lot of different institutions where we think if we can industrialize the process of making iPS cells, then there is a business to be had in the generation of those materials." Despite the fact that Dr. Keller’s specialty is in the derivation of cardiovascular progenitor cells from embryonic stem cells, therefore, this particular licensing application of the IP that Dr. Keller developed would seem to be intended for cells that are of adult somatic, not embryonic stem cell, origin.

Such a point is not insignificant, especially in light of the fact that Dr. James Thomson, one of the founders of CDI and CDI’s Chief Scientific Officer, is renowned throughout the world for having been the first person ever to isolate an embryonic stem cell in the laboratory, first from a nonhuman primate in 1995 and then from a human in 1998. Known as "the father of embryonic stem cell science", Dr. Thomson is credited with having spawned the entire field of embryonic stem cell research, and the mere mention of his name invokes sincere reverence from embryonic stem cell scientists throughout the world. Yet on numerous occasions, Dr. Thomson himself has emphasized the point that iPS cells hold greater medical potential than embryonic stem cells, and furthermore, unlike embryonic stem cells, iPS cells are created from adult somatic (ordinary, non-stem cell) cells, and are therefore derived without the need for embryos at all. In fact, Dr. Thomson and his colleagues in his laboratory at the University of Wisconsin at Madison were also co-developers of iPS cell technology, although this fact is often overshadowed by Dr. Thomson’s earlier, more dramatic pioneering work in embryonic stem cell research. However, the fact that CDI is now investing so heavily in research that involves iPS cells, not embryonic stem cells, is further evidence for the greater medical usefulness and commercial priority of iPS cells over embryonic stem cells. Why, exactly, this rather crucial and fundamental point was never explicitly clarified in any of the news announcements, however, is anyone’s guess.

CDI has plans that extend beyond cardiovascular progenitor cells, as Mr. Kendrick-Parker explains that the company is developing projects "for a variety of different cell types that run the gamut of tools that are required for pharmacology and toxicity testing." Still, however, the final goal of CDI’s stem cell R&D, regardless of the specific types of cells that are involved, is for purposes of drug screening – and the profitable commercialization of drug screening tools – not for the development of cell-based clinical therapies.

Specific terms of the licensing agreement have not been disclosed.

Pluristem Announces Clinical Trial Site, and Receives Patent For Adult Stem Cell Expansion Method

The biotech company Pluristem Therapeutics, formerly known as Pluristem Life Systems, has been granted patent # 7,534,609 for a method of expanding undifferentiated hemopoietic stem cells.

Pluristem Therapeutics specializes in the development and commercialization of allogeneic (in which the donor and the recipient are not the same person) cellular therapy products derived from the human placenta for the treatment of severe ischemic autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis, peripheral artery disease, ischemic stroke, inflammatory bowel disease including Crohn’s disease, and others. The company’s proprietary technology includes a 3D bioreactor, PluriX, which simulates the microenvironment of bone marrow substrates for the large-scale culturing and three-dimensional expansion of stromal cells without the need for supplemental growth factors or other exogenous materials. The cells generated by PluriX, known as "PLX" (PLacental eXpanded) cells, not only possess "immune privileged" properties but also immunomodulatory properties as well, and are expandable in vitro without exhibiting phenotypic or karyotypic changes. This new patent, however, was awarded to Pluristem for an invention involving methods and materials by which undifferentiated hemopoietic stem cells may be expanded in a novel type of bioreactor which is separate and distinct from the PluriX.

Pluristem Therapeutics is focused on the development and commercialization of off-the-shelf allogeneic cell-based therapies for the treatment of chronic degenerative ischemic and autoimmune disorders. As described on their website, Pluristem specializes in adherent stromal cells (ASCs) that are derived from the human placenta and which "are multipotent adult stem cells that have strong anti-inflammatory properties and can regenerate and repair damaged tissue." ASCs have already been shown to differentiate into nerve, bone, muscle, fat, tendon, ligament, cartilage and bone marrow stroma. Additionally, since they have low immunogenicity, ASCs do not require HLA (human leukocyte antigen) matching and are not at risk of being rejected by the patient’s immune system. After the ASCs are harvested from placental tissue, the cells are then expanded three-dimensionally into the PLX cells via the company’s proprietary PluriX 3D bioreactor, in which the cells are able to excrete their own cytokines and other immune modulators without the need for risky supplemental growth factors nor other exogenous materials. As adult stem cells that are derived from the human placenta, which is an extremely rich source of non-embryonic stem cells, ASCs are also ethically non-controversial in addition to being highly potent adult stem cells.

As stated on Pluristem’s website, "The Company has made a strategic decision to work only with adult stem cells since the practical use of embryonic stem cells is severely restricted by various religious, ethical and legal considerations."

In a manner which is similar to that by which the PluriX bioreactor three-dimensionally expands ASCs into PLX cells, the new invention allows undifferentiated hemopoietic cells to be expanded three-dimensionally upon stromal feeder cells, without undergoing differentiation. At least theoretically, such a bioreactor could be adapted to any type of cell, and a reviewer of the patent in StemCellPatents.com suggested the applicability of the bioreactor to the expansion of embryonic and iPS cells.

In separate though related news stories, earlier this year Pluristem received approval to begin clinical trials for the treatment of critical limb ischemia with its proprietary adult stem cell product PLX-PAD, an allogeneic placental-derived stromal cell product. In May of 2009, Pluristem also announced the selection of a major clinical site in North Carolina for the PLX-PAD Phase I clinical trial, which will be conducted at Duke University Medical Center. According to Zami Aberman, president and CEO of Pluristem, "We are very pleased to be working with Duke University Medical Center on the Phase I clinical trial using our PLX cells and believe that being involved with such a prestigious, reputable institution emphasizes the important therapeutic future for our mesenchymal-like stem cells."

According to Duke University cardiologist Dr. Robert Mitchell, the principal investigator for the PLX-PAD trial, "We look forward to collaborating with Pluristem in studying this interesting potential approach to dealing with limb ischemia. This is an oftentimes devastating disease and beginning the process of understanding the action of these cells in a Phase I clinical trial is an important step forward."

In the U.S. alone, it has been estimated that as many as 12 million people suffer from critical limb ischemia (CLI), an advanced form of peripheral artery disease (PAD) that is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, often resulting in amputation and frequent hospitalization. Although standard medical therapies are currently ineffective in treating CLI, the market value for an effective CLI therapy has been projected to be over $1 billion. For the first time, cell-based therapies such as Pluristem’s PLX-PAD offer a potentially safe and effective treatment of a life-threatening medical condition which previously has been incurable.

In addition to its cell-based therapy for CLI, Pluristem is currently developing other adult stem cell products for the treatment of other degenerative, malignant and autoimmune disorders. The company’s first product, PLX-BMT, was directed at improving the engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood as an alternative to bone marrow transplantation.

Although the company’s most recent patent, for a method of expanding undifferentiated hemopoietic stem cells, was awarded on May 19, 2009, the patent application was originally filed on April 11, 2005, at which time the company was known as Pluristem Life Systems. On November 26 of 2007, however, corresponding to a reverse stock split and the designation of a new ticker symbol, the company also announced the official change of its name to Pluristem Therapeutics.

(Please see the related news article on this website, entitled, "Pluristem to Begin Adult Stem Cell Clinical Trials for Critical Limb Ischemia", dated January 13, 2009).