Enrollment Begins in Adult Stem Cell Clinical Trial for Ischemic Stroke

The Canadian company Stem Cell Therapeutics (SCT) has received authorization from the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) to begin enrollment in the Phase IIb clinical trial for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with adult stem cells.

The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, which has a recruitment target of 128 to 130 patients, will utilize the modified REGENESIS proprietary protocol developed by SCT. Dr. Steven C. Cramer from UC-Irvine and Dr. Michael D. Hill of the University of Calgary are the two principle investigators of the study.

According to Dr. Alan Moore, president and CEO of SCT, "Approval from DCGI to initiate recruitment for the modified REGENESIS stroke trial in India is an exciting milestone for SCT. Jurisdictional approvals have now been granted in India, the U.S. and Canada, therefore we will begin recruiting patients as soon as possible."

In accordance with their regulations, the DCGI states that, "The DCGI approval process categorizes clinical trials into two types. If the study protocol has already been approved by a cognizant regulatory authority in one or more developed countries (such as the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Switzerland, Germany, Australia, Japan, and South Africa), the study is classified as a Type A trial and can be approved using a fast-track process within two to six weeks after the required documentation has been submitted. All other studies are classified as Type B. For these, the approval process is generally 8 to 12 weeks. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process can be conducted in parallel with the DCGI review and, if import licenses are needed, the applications for these can also proceed in parallel. These provisions facilitate the process of getting study protocols in place and quickly initiating the trials." In other words, India is an excellent place in which to conduct clinical trials, since the approval process moves much more quickly than it does in many other countries. A number of businesses from the U.S., the U.K. and Europe are therefore turning to countries such as India for the testing and commercialization of their new medical products, whether related to stem cells or not.

In this particular case, the therapeutic product developed by SCT, known as REGENESIS, contains a proprietary combination of compounds which are designed to stimulate the body’s naturally occurring, endogenous adult stem cells for the healing and repair of damaged tissue. As described on the company’s website, "Stem Cell Therapeutics Corp. is a Canadian public biotechnology company focused on the development and commercialization of drug-based therapies to treat central nervous system diseases. SCT is a leader in the development of therapies that utilize drugs to stimulate a patient’s own resident stem cells. The Company’s programs aim to repair brain and nerve function lost due to disease or injury. The Company’s extensive patent portfolio of owned and licensed intellectual property supports the potential expansion into future clinical programs in numerous neurological diseases such as traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and ALS."

Heart Damage in Mice Repaired With iPS Cells

Researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, have used induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to treat damaged cardiac tissue in a mouse model of heart attack. The iPS cells were found to repair the heart tissue both structurally and functionally.

According to Timothy Nelson, M.D., Ph.D., one of the lead investigators of the research, "This study establishes the real potential for using iPS cells in cardiac treatment. Bioengineered fibroblasts acquired the capacity to repair and regenerate infarcted hearts."

Previously, iPS cells had been tested in animal models for three other diseases, namely, Parkinson’s disease, sickle cell anemia, and hemophilia A. This new study is the first of its kind in which iPS cells were tested specifically for their ability to regenerate cardiac tissue.

As Dr. Nelson further explains, "We’re taking advantage of a diseased tissue environment that is sending out a distress signal that is asking the tissue to repair itself. When we put these iPS cells in, they are able to respond. They were able to respond to this damaged environment and spontaneously give rise to the appropriate tissues and create new tissues within that diseased heart. That is a key ‘wow factor’ of this paper. It was obvious to the observer which animals had been treated and which ones hadn’t."

The scientists used fibroblasts which they genetically reprogrammed to dedifferentiate into iPS cells which were then redifferentiated into heart tissue. When transplanted directly into the damaged hearts of the mice, the new cells were found to have engrafted within two weeks of transplantation, and by 4 weeks the transplanted cells were found to have contributed to improved structure and function of the hearts. Not only did the iPS cells halt the progression of structural damage within the heart muscle itself, but the iPS cells were also found to regenerate new cardiac tissue which included not only heart muscle but also blood vessels. Ultrasound also revealed significant improvement in the ability of the hearts to pump blood.

According to Adre Terzic, M.D., Ph.D., Mayo Clinic physician and senior author of the study, "This iPS innovation lays the groundwork for translational applications. Through advances in nuclear programming, we should be able to reverse the fate of adult cells and customize ‘on demand’ cardiovascular regenerative medicine."

However, the researchers still used dangerous viral vectors for dedifferentiation of the fibroblasts into iPS cells, even though other scientists have replaced such methods with less dangerous reprogramming techniques.

Nevertheless, according to Dr. Nelson, he believes that iPS technology will be able to be used in clinical therapies to help people, eventually, even though it might take "several years". Until then, iPS cells are still ineligible for clinical therapeutic use since there are still a number of biological hurdles remaining that have yet to be overcome.

Meanwhile, autologous adult stem cells have already been used therapeutically in the clinical treatment of heart and other conditions, and are already available in clinics around the world – except, that is, in the U.S., where outdated FDA regulations have been unable to keep pace with scientific progress.

Cord Blood America Highlights 2009 Stem Cell Progress

Cord Blood America Inc. (CBAI), one of the largest providers in the world of umbilical cord blood stem cell preservation, reviews its accomplishments thus far in 2009. Even though the year is only half over, CBAI considers its achievements thus far in 2009 to be among the most significant in the company’s history. Some of its accomplishments in the first half of this year are described herein.

In January: The company launched its first social media campaign in the industry to start a public conversation about the potential usefulness of adult stem cells and the importance of storing umbilical cord blood. Additionally, the company established its "3 pillars of success" for 2009, which are, namely, organic growth, acquisitions, and debt reduction for an improvement in the company’s balance sheet.

In February: CBAI was listed on the ETF Innovators Stem Cell 40 company index. Additionally, CBAI announced $1 million in long-term debt reduction as part of its cash-flow restructuring.

In March: CBAI was noted as the top stock performer on ETF Innovators Stem Cell index, with a year-to-date stock price increase of 279% at that time.

In April: Congress introduced legislation to promote the "Family Banking of Umbilical Cord Blood" stem cells, which is a major boost to the entire cord blood banking industry. Additionally, CBAI received its first customer in Germany and announced a long-term debt reduction of over $2.5 million.

In May: CBAI announced that it had received $2.3 million for the purpose of building its own stem cell processing and storage laboratory, rather than continuing to outsource the services, which thereby resulted in a further debt reduction of $4.2 million.

In June: CBAI announced further expansion throughout Europe as well as independent contracting with affilates in the Caribbean and Central America.

In July: CBAI has further secured $7.5 in long-term equity financing for acquisition and growth opportunities, while also hiring a separate management team to direct its new stem cell laboratories in the U.S., which will be among the largest in the country, construction on which has already begun.

According to Matthew Schissler, chairman and CEO of CBAI, "On January 6, 2009, the closing CBAI stock price was $0.0017. On July 10, 2009, the closing stock price was $0.0033, a 94% increase in 6 months of trading. That’s not where we want to be, we are still very undervalued, and I understand that the day-to-day swings of our very liquid and volatile stock price cause some investor concern. I tell investors to take a snapshot of the last 6 months, not six hours. Micro cap stocks are perhaps not for the faint-of-heart. We believe we’re building a very valuable company and this snapshot of the past 6 months shows our progress."

Additionally, Mr. Schissler adds, "In January, CBAI stated its mission is to lay the foundation for a much stronger, healthier company by the end of 2009, which included organic growth, acquisition and debt reduction. As you can see by these highlights, we remain laser-focused on executing these strategies. Because of our focus, we are able to raise significant funding to build a lab with the future growth opportunities it affords us. We are also pleased by the current support of stem cell research in Washington, D.C. and Congressional and state legislative focus on family stem cell banking legislation."

CBAI is the parent company of Cord Partners, which was founded in 2002 and became operational on January 1, 2003. According to the company’s website, "Cord Partners, a Cord Blood America company, has established itself as a platinum standard national competitor in the umbilical cord blood storage industry… CBAI was founded on a simple principle: The families who seek stem cell preservation should never have to work to achieve this. By bundling such services as medical kit preparation, medical courier arrangement, 24/7 customer service, easy enrollment, and one price for all services, we feel an unparalleled commitment to our clinets, and have the foundation for providing the highest quality stem cell preservation available."

Umbilical cord blood is an extremely rich source of highly potent adult stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells and CD34+ cells, which have already been in use for decades in the clinical treatment of various diseases, safely and without side effects. Unlike embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood are ethically noncontroversial, as umbilical cord blood is easily and harmlessly collectable.

Adult Stem Cells Treat Scleroderma

Mike George, a retired junior high school principal, had been suffering from an advanced case of systemic scleroderma. Translated literally as "hard skin", scleroderma is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis (tightening and hardening of tissue) and for which conventional medicine has no known cure. Of the two main versions of the disease, the systemic version (also known as diffuse cutaneous scleroderma) involves internal organs as well as the skin. In the version of the disease known as limited cutaneous scleroderma, symptoms are limited primarily to the skin, although secondary complications may manifest in the pulmonary system. Vascular complications are not uncommon in the systemic version, and when one or more internal organs are affected, the disease can be fatal.

Fourteen months ago, however, Mr. George underwent autologous adult stem cell therapy as part of a clinical trial at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago. Now, according to Mr. George, "I feel really good. I feel I was reborn. It’s great to be alive."

Prior to the therapy last year, Mr. George’s skin was stiff, his face was tight, he could only swallow with difficulty, any type of physical movement was an effort, and his doctors were concerned that the disease had begun spreading to his heart and lungs. Upon his return back home after the therapy, however, Mr. George was able to lift his luggage out of the trunk of his taxi – an accomplishment which had not been possible prior to the stem cell therapy. The next month, as Mr. George describes, his physician didn’t recognize him. "In April, the doctor said, are you sure I didn’t give you a lung transplant, instead of a stem cell transplant?" Although the stem cell therapy has not totally cured Mr. George, it has stopped the progression of the disease and to some extent reversed it, with noticeable improvement not only in his skin but also in his heart and lungs as well.

On May 17, 2005, it was announced that Northwestern Memorial Hospital and the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago together launched the Northwestern Scleroderma Program, which offers patients with scleroderma a unique program of comprehensive care. According to Dr. John Varga, a rheumatologist and director of the Northwestern Scleroderma Program, "Patients who are diagnosed with scleroderma are often told that there is little that can be done for them. At Northwestern, our integrated team of experts specializes in the treatment of scleroderma and all of its related conditions. We can offer patients treatment options they can’t find elsewhere, like bone marrow transplants, while also giving them access to other important disease management services such as physical and rehabilitative therapy and nutritional counseling and support." As described on their website, "The Northwestern Scleroderma Program offers the latest advances in diagnostics and treatment for scleroderma, including bronchoscopy and lavage, high-resolution CT scanning, right heart hemodynamics (blood circulation), advanced esophageal studies, innovative treatments for pulmonary hypertension and scleroderma lung disease, as well as autologous stem cell therapies."

In fact, on this website we have previously reported a number of times in the past on various clinical studies conducted at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in which patients have shown dramatic success after having received autologous adult stem cell therapy, usually for the treatment of other types of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis. In particular, Richard Burt, M.D., Chief of the Division of Immunotherapy for Autoimmune Diseases at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, is gaining increasing attention for his pioneering use of hematopoietic stem cells in the treatment of various autoimmune diseases which include not only multiple sclerosis but also rhematoid arthritis, lupus, and Chron’s disease, among others. In 2006 Dr. Burt was named within The Scientific American 50, which is the magazine’s annual list of outstanding leaders in science and technology. According to John Rennie, editor-in-chief of the magazine, "The Scientific American 50 pays tribute to individuals and organizations who, through their efforts in research, business and policy-making, are driving advances in science and technology that lay the groundwork for a better future. Not only does our list honor these prime movers, it shines a spotlight on the critical fields that are benefiting from their achievements." Continuing his distinguished and pioneering use of autologous adult stem cell therapy, Dr. Burt is currently involved in ongoing randomized clinical trials for a number of autoimmune diseases which include systemic scleroderma.

Usually, in clinical trials, patients are neither charged nor remunerated for their participation in the trial. However, even though the scleroderma clinical trials at Northwestern are FDA-approved and tightly controlled, nevertheless Mr. George had to pay for the medical services that he received as a participant in the study, which came to more than $200,000. Family members, friends, and the communities at his church and school district helped contribute to the cost of his medical expenses.

In the study, the autologous adult stem cells were harvested from Mr. George’s own bone marrow and then readministered to him therapeutically after having been isolated, purified and expanded in the laboratory. First, however, he also received a heavy dose of chemotherapy, the purpose of which was to "cleanse" his immune system before he received his own adult stem cells, which not only served as a therapy for his scleroderma but also "rescued" his immune system from deliberate destruction by the chemotherapy. The use of chemotherapy prior to autologous adult stem cell therapy is, unfortunately, not uncommon. Fortunately, however, the scientific logic of such a routine practice is becoming increasingly questioned.

In actuality, other doctors have already demonstrated success in treating various autoimmune diseases with adult stem cell therapy, but without the brutal and deliberate destruction of the immune system with chemotherapy. Known as immunological myeloablation, such a procedure had previously been considered a necessary part of any transplant therapy, even though it exposes the patient to potentially life-threatening risks. Today, however, an increasing number of doctors are questioning the logic and necessity of subjecting their patients to deliberate immune destruction, and with valid scientific reason. In a publication that appeared over two years ago, in the Journal of Translational Medicine in January of 2007, Dr. Neil H. Riordan et al. posed the following question: "…in patients who are not suffering from a disease that is associated with an aberrant bone marrow such as hematological malignancies or immunological dysfunctions, how is it justifiable to subject them to the high levels of morbidity and mortality associated with immune suppression?" Dr. Riordan and his team of scientists then examined compelling evidence which strongly indicates that pre-transplant immune suppression is unnecessary for autologous hematopoietic cell therapies and even for some types of allogeneic therapies, such as those that utilize "universal donor" cells such as mesenchymal stem cells and the CD34+ stem cells that are found in umbilical cord blood, and for which immune rejection is not even a concern. As Dr. Riordan and his colleagues wrote in their 2007 paper in a section that is subtitled, "Mesenchymal stem cells do not need myeloablation for efficacy": "Currently there are several ongoing clinical trials in Phase I-III using ‘universal donor’ mesenchymal stem cells in non-conditioned recipients of Crohn’s disease, GVHD (graft-versus-host disease) and myocardial infarction. Although these cells are bone marrow expanded mesenchymal cells, the superior proliferative potential of cord blood mesenchymal cells may allow them not only to escape immune destruction, but also to expand in vivo and mediate therapeutic effects superior to those derived from bone marrow. The fact that regulatory agencies have allowed advancement of ‘off-the-shelf’ universal donor mesenchymal stem cells supports the numerous reports of clinical efficacy in an allogeneic setting." Therefore, certainly with autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cell therapy, there is no risk of immune rejection so there is no need to destroy the immune system with chemotherapy; but even with many types of allogeneic (in which the donor and recipient are not the same person) adult stem cell therapy, such as with "immune privileged" "universal donor" stem cells, there is also no need to destroy the immune system with chemotherapy.

Nevertheless, for clinical trials such as those conducted at Northwestern University, the autologous adult stem cell therapies offer tangible improvement – at least for those patients who survive the life-threatening destruction of their immune systems from the chemotherapy. One can only conclude, therefore, as has already been demonstrated by other doctors at other clinics, that patients would exhibit even greater and faster improvement if they did not have to recover from the deliberate destruction of their immune systems prior to receiving the stem cell therapy. Additionally, other clinical evidence indicates that even greater patient improvement would be seen if the stem cell therapy would utilize the "superior proliferative potential" of the adult stem cells that are found in umbilical cord blood.

It has been estimated that between 150,000 and 300,000 people in the U.S. alone suffer from scleroderma. Having been one of the fortunate patients who was strong enough to survive the deliberate and unncessary destruction of his immune system prior to receiving his autologous adult stem cell therapy, Mr. George is now a devout believer in autologous adult stem cells. "I’m like an advocate," he says. "All my life, I wanted to help people. Helping kids was my forte. Now to help someone in need who doesn’t know what to expect, it raises it to a whole different level."

Clinical Results From Embryonic Stem Cells are “Decades Away”

In an article entitled "The Dirty Secret of Embryonic Stem Cell Research", the noted science journalist, author, attorney and director of the Independent Journalism Project, Michael Fumento, writes an eye-opening assessment of the stem cell field.

Michael Fumento begins his article in today’s issue of Forbes by citing the widespread, popular consensus among the general, nonscientific public that cures for all sorts of diseases are imminent, now that the infallible Obama administration has suddenly lifted all restrictions which the nefarious Bush administration imposed upon stem cell research. Such popular consensus, however, is grossly misguided and uninformed, as Mr. Fumento proceeds to demonstrate.

As Mr. Fumento points out, "Quadriplegics probably shouldn’t sign up for the New York City Marathon just yet. If these cures are just around the corner, this corner is far, far away. And that’s according to embryonic stem cell researchers and funding advocates themselves. The time frame for the first of those miracles seems routinely to be given as a ‘decade’, as in ‘a decade away’ or ‘a decade off.’ And it keeps shifting."

Fumento then reminds the reader that in 1998, when Dr. James Thomson isolated the first human embryonic stem cell in the laboratory, it was reported in an article at that time that Dr. Thomson and his colleagues themselves "warn that such clinical applications are perhaps as much as a decade away." That was in 1998, which by now was over a decade ago – and still, as of 2009, there have not yet been any clinical applications, not even one, that have resulted from human embryonic stem cell research. Continuing from the 1998 article, as Fumento then adds, "Check your calendar. Addressing a 2007 Wisconsin convention 9 years later, Thomson articulated that the time frame had shifted to ‘decades away’, plural."

As Fumento goes on to explain, "The scientists didn’t blame too little federal funding, as have others, according to the Associated Press. Rather, Thomson blamed simple biology. Among other problems, embryonic stem cells require permanent use of dangerous immunosuppressive drugs. They have a nasty tendency to form tumors both malignant and benign including teratomas – meaning ‘monster tumor’. Teratomas can grow larger than a football and can contain eyeball parts, hair and teeth." As Fumento further exclaims, "Yech!"

He goes on to ponder, "OK, so how many ‘decades’?" Among others, the answer is given by William Haseltine, former CEO of The Human Genome Project, who told the Agence France Presse in 2001 that, "The routine utilization of human embryonic stem cells for medicine is 20 to 30 years hence", to which Haseltine further added, "The timeline to commercialization is so long that I simply would not invest." There are other embryonic stem cell researchers, however, who believe that "3 to 5 decades" is more realistic, while the British fertility expert and Imperial College, London University professor Lord Robert Winston proclaimed in a 2005 lecture that, "I am not entirely convinced that embryonic stem cells will, in my lifetime and possibly anybody’s lifetime for that matter, be holding quite the promise that we desperately hope they will," further adding that "one of the problems is that in order to persuade the public that we must do this work, we often go rather too far in promising what we might achieve."

Fumento further points out that the 2007 AP article stated, "One day, some believe embryonic stem cells will become sources of brain tissue, muscle and bone marrow to replace diseased or injured body parts." In other words, maybe "one day" in the future, even though such goals have not yet been attained with human embryonic stem cells, not even as recently as 2007 nor even today in 2009. Meanwhile, however, various types of adult stem cells have already been differentiated into these and other types of tissue, decades ago. As Fumento explains, "Life-saving marrow regeneration with stem cells dates back to 1956."

Additionally, "Adult stem cells have now treated scores of illnesses including many cancers, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular disease, immunodeficiency disorders, neural degenerative diseases, anemias and other blood conditions," Fumento points out. "They’ve been used in over 2,000 human clinical trials. There has never been an embryonic stem cell clinical trial. Former National Institutes of Health director Dr. Bernardine Healy, once an embryonic stem cell research enthusiast, now calls them ‘obsolete’."

Indeed, as previously reported a number of times on this website, Dr. James Thomson himself – widely revered as "the father of embryonic stem cell science" – has often emphasized the importance of other types of cells, especially iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cells, over embryonic stem cells. In fact, the company which Dr. Thomson cofounded, Cellular Dynamics International, has as its primary focus today the commercialization of iPS cells, not embryonic stem cells – and not for the development of actual cell-based clinical therapies, but instead for the use of these iPS cells in drug screening and pharmaceutical development. (Please see a number of articles on this website related to Cellular Dynamics International, including but not limited to those entitled, "Leading Researcher Joins Cellular Dynamics", dated July 22, 2009; "Wisconsin Stem Cell Company Announces Licensing Agreement", dated July 15, 2009; "Cellular Dynamics Creates iPS Cells From Human Blood", dated July 8, 2009; and "Cellular Dynamics and Mount Sinai Sign Licensing Agreement", dated May 29, 2009).

As Fumento concludes, "In justifying his stem cell research executive order, President Barack Obama cited ‘a consensus of the majority of Americans.’ Actually, the polling responses vary tremendously depending on the questions asked. But no decision is better than the information upon which it’s based. What might Americans think if they knew the embryonic stem cell reseach ‘decades away’ secret?"

(Please see a number of articles on this website related to the embryonic stem cell versus adult stem cell controversy, including but not limited to that entitled, "Former Director of N.I.H. Explains Why Embryonic Stem Cells are Obsolete", dated March 4, 2009, as originally reported in U.S. News & World Report).

Adult Stem Cells Continue Going to the Dogs

Zack was suffering from a number of degenerative osteoarthritis conditions, despite the fact that he is only 14 years old. Of course, for a dog, 14 is not young. Fortunately for Zack, however, his owner decided to allow him to try stem cell therapy.

According to Deanna Winter, Zack’s owner who is also a doctor for people, "His main problem is arthritis. Trouble walking, trouble sitting and going upstairs." Furthermore, she adds, "His belly was almost touching the ground because he couldn’t hold his hips up. His quality of life was going down. He couldn’t make it around the block anymore."

Dr. Benjamin Ealing at Broad Ripple Animal Clinic in Indianapolis, not far from Zack’s home, has already used autologous adult stem cell treatment on 13 other dogs, successfully in each case. Dr. Ealing surgically removes abdominal fat from the dog, "which about fits in the palm of your hand and fills up two tubes", he describes. The adipose tissue is then shipped to the Vet-Stem laboratories in California where the stem cells are isolated, purified, expanded and returned to Dr. Ealing within 48 hours, already in syringes and ready to be injected into the site of the afflicted joints – which in Zack’s case were a hip and a shoulder. Although results are usually noticeable immediately, the greatest results take about 2 weeks to manifest. Now, two months later, Zack "can walk and he can sit and he can jump and he can go up stairs", as Deanna describes.

As Dr. Ealing adds, "The stem cells are the body’s own natural healing cells. Those cells then recruit the body’s own natural healing cells to come to that area, reduce inflammation, potentially to regenerate damaged tissue."

By now, Zack’s story is becoming an increasingly familiar one. As previously reported a number of times on this website, the company Vet-Stem continues to see consistently high success rates in both canine and equine clinical applications, with an 80% efficacy rate and a 100% safety rate in the animals that are treated with Vet-Stem’s autologous adult stem cell procedure. In other words, 80% of the animals treated are found to experience improvement in their condition with a reduction and often a full elimination of the need for medication, while adverse side effects have not been reported in any of the treated animals.

Since Vet-Stem first began marketing their services, they have now treated more than 2,000 dogs and more than 3,000 horses with autologous adult stem cells, extracted from each animal’s own fat. The procedure is quick, simple, minimally invasive, safe, highly effective, and while it is not cheap, it is less expensive than conventional surgical and pharmaceutical therapies which may not be effective at all. The first stem cell extraction and transplant for a dog typically run between $2,500 and $3,500, although the second transplant will often cost much less since extraction is only necessary once. The entire stem cell extraction procedure consists of the approximate equivalent of 2 to 3 tablespoons of the animal’s own adipose (fat) tissue which is surgically removed under anesthesia and shipped overnight to Vet-Stem’s laboratories in southern California where the stem cells are processed and returned two days later to the veterinarian who injects the stem cells back into the animal. Not only do the stem cells automatically target the injured tissue, but they also stimulate other endogenous stem cells which in turn are mobilized into action and participate in the healing and repair process. Although improvements are usually dramatic and immediate, even after the first injection, additional injections may be necessary, depending upon the age and condition of the animal. Very few animals ever need more than a total or 2 or 3 treatments, however, before they are fully restored to their natural, pain-free state of mobility – which contrasts sharply with conventional therapies such as most prescription medications which may need to be taken indefinitely, without ever producing any tangible signs of improvement and while even possibly causing further damage to the animal through dangerous side effects and other associated risks.

Vet-Stem uses exclusively adult stem cells, derived from each animal’s own tissue. Since the cells are autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same animal), there is no risk of immune rejection. More specifically, the stem cells that are harvested in Vet-Stem’s procedure are mesenchymal stem cells, which are highly potent adult stem cells that are also found in bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. Numerous scientific and clinical studies have been published in the peer-reviewed medical literature detailing the regenerative properties of mesenchymal stem cells. No embryonic stem cells are ever used in Vet-Stem’s therapies, since embryonic stem cells are highly problematic in the laboratory, whether they are of human or non-human origin. Among other problems, the risk of teratoma (tumor) formation disqualifies embryonic stem cells for use as a clinical therapy, even in animals. Adult stem cells, however, do not pose such risks and are therefore rapidly accumulating a consistent history of successful clinical treatments in veterinary, as well as in human, medicine.

A number of companies throughout the world are replicating the procedure pioneered by Vet-Stem. It is fortunate – not only for Zack but also for his 2-legged friends who learn from his example – that such companies are able to conduct their business without the same burdensome federal legislation that continues to impede progress in human medical adult stem cell therapies in the United States.

(Please see a number of other related news article on this website, which include but are not limited to the most recent one entitled, "Veterinary Stem Cell Therapies Translate into Human Therapies", dated July 14, 2009).

New NIH Stem Cell Guidelines are Slowing Research

According to Dr. Steve Duncan, professor of human and molecular genetics at the Medical College of Wisconsin, the failure of the new NIH Guidelines to "grandfather" in the already existing hESC lines has had a "tremendously detrimental effect on our research."

As Dr. Duncan explains, "The problem is they haven’t added the presidential lines as a group of lines that we can now use. So we can’t do any human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research with new federal funds at this point. We’re hoping within the next two months that it will be relaxed, but that’s a long time in research and it’s reallly upsetting, the way it’s been handled."

Once again, as previously reported a number of times on this website, at the heart of the debate are the "voluntary and informed consent" rules which are contained within the new NIH Guidelines. Many, if not all, of the hESC lines that already exist were created before such rules of consent were authored, and therefore do not meet "the core ethical principles and procedures" that are defined in the new NIH Guidelines. Even though NIH says that such hESCs are subject to review by an advisory committee and might therefore be "grandfathered" in, there is still widespread doubt among the ESC scientific community that many of those lines will be approved for the federal funding of research.

In fact, contrary to popular opinion, there is one major obstacle in the U.S. which is preventing stem cell therapies from being available in clinics at this very moment, and that obstacle has nothing to do with NIH nor with embryonic stem cells nor with any restrictions that the Bush administration supposedly imposed nor with any restrictions that the Obama administration supposedly lifted. Instead, that one, single, primary obstacle is the fact that the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has decreed that autologus (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells are a "drug", and therefore must be regulated as such, and therefore cannot be used for therapeutic purposes in the U.S. without having first been subjected to the lengthy, lethargic, outdated, multi-year, multi-million dollar federal governmental approval process, in the same manner as which pharmaceutically manufactured drugs are regulated. Such a stance is without any scientific basis whatsoever, and a number of individuals and organizations are attempting to initiate a much-needed and long-overdue reform of the FDA on this issue. Until the FDA is completely overhauled, however, it seems as though U.S. academicians will continue to focus all of their time and attention on arguing over the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research while apparently remaining oblivious to the fact that doctors and patients are not willing to sit around and wait another decade for something to happen, but instead are traveling overseas where adult stem cell therapies are already available in clinics in just about every country in the world except the United States. (Please see the related news articles on this website, entitled, "Arizona Man Travels to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy", dated July 16, 2009; "Bangor Family Heads to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy", dated July 8, 2009; "Texas Woman Travels to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Treatment", dated June 25, 2009, and "Two U.S. Adult Stem Cell Companies Form Collaboration in Asia", dated May 11, 2009).

Despite all the exaggerated hype over embryonic stem cells, usually at the complete exclusion of adult stem cells, Dr. Duncan nevertheless predicts that future stem cell research will shift more toward adult rather than embryonic stem cells, and not just for the numerous sound scientific and medical reasons but also for ethical reasons as well. Despite his own interest in hESC research at the moment, he also pointed out that, "I think we have to take into account the ethical situation."

Veterinary Stem Cell Therapies Translate into Human Therapies

As previously reported on this website a number of times, rapid progress has been made over the past few years in veterinary medicine using autologous adult stem cells. Now, the consistent success of such therapy is finally getting the attention of the human medical community, which is beginning to replicate the veterinary procedures in human clinical trials.

Autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same individual, whether a person or a dog or a horse) adult stem cell therapy has been routinely used in recent years for the treatment of a variety of conditions in large domesticated animals. Such conditions most commonly include orthopedic injuries in competitive horses, while in dogs the most commonly treated condition is age-related degenerative osteoarthritis. Although such stem cell therapies could also be of benefit to smaller animals such as cats, orthopedic injuries are not usually life-threatening to these smaller animals whereas such an injury could be fatal for a thoroughbred race horse. Consequently, veterinary stem cell therapy has been applied very aggressively to these valuable, expensive, large animals whose lives and competitive careers have literally been saved by such therapies. Even for dogs who do not earn large salaries in high-profile competitions but who are merely beloved pets, autologous adult stem cell therapy has also proven to be life-saving. Meanwhile, in human medicine, however, nothing whatsoever has been allowed to happen in U.S. clinics outside of a small number of government-approved clinical trials, thanks to an outdated, lengthy, lethargic and prohibitively expensive FDA approval process. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that veterinary stem cell medicine has quickly outpaced human stem cell medicine – but now, at last, humans are beginning to learn something from their canine and equine friends.

Companies such as Vet-Stem in the U.S. and VetCell in the U.K. have accumulated numerous documented cases of the benefits of autologous adult stem cell therapy in animals. To name just a few of the advantages, adult stem cell therapy yields faster healing and shorter recovery times than surgical treatments do, and adult stem cell therapy does not pose a risk of any side effects like medications do. Additionally, since the adult stem cells are autologous, there is no risk of immune injection. The U.K. company VetCell derives the autologous adult stem cells from the animal’s bone marrow, and to date has treated approximately 1,700 horses with an 80% success rate. By comparison, the U.S. company Vet-Stem derives the autologous adult stem cells from the animal’s adipose (fat) tissue, and to date has treated over 2,000 dogs and over 3,000 horses, also with an 80% success rate. With both companies, the procedure is quick, simple, and minimally invasive. Although the treatment is more expensive than conventional veterinary procedures, the adult stem cell treatment actually works, and noticeable improvement is seen almost immediately in all cases, not just in the 80% of cases that exhibit a complete recovery. By sharp contrast, however, conventional surgical and pharmacological therapies, which might initially be less expensive than stem cell therapy, only have a 30% success rate and therefore in the long-term are actually more expensive when repeated treatment is needed, or when improvements are not seen at all. Additionally, reinjury is significantly lower in animals who receive autologous adult stem cell therapy, due to the mechanism of action by which these stem cells activate the healing process. As Dr. David Mountford, a veterinary surgeon and chief operating officer at VetCell, explains, "After 3 years, the reinjury rate was much lower in stem-cell-treated animals: about 23% compared with the published average of 56%" for animals treated with conventional therapies.

According to Dr. Sean Owens, veterinarian and founding director of the Regenerative Medicine Laboratory at UC-Davis, "Soft-tissue injury is the number-one injury competitive horses will suffer, and it can end a thoroughbred horse’s career." Additionally, Dr. Owens adds, "Regulatory oversight of veterinary medicine is minimal. For the most part, the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) have not waded into the regulatory arena for us." Precisely because of such a lack of federal government regulation in the veterinary industry, this newly created research center which Dr. Owens has established is able to dedicate itself to the advancement of animal stem cell medicine, which in turn should translate into the advancement of human stem cell medicine through parallel clinical trials. A number of ongoing clinical trials in horses are conducted at the Laboratory, which include those for tendon tears and those for fractured bone chips in the knee – and now a similar type of autologous adult stem cell therapy for these same conditions will be developed for human clinical trials. Ultimately, such a program will result not only in the development of better treatments for horses, but also in the development of better treatments for humans. Currently Dr. Owens is collaborating with Dr. Jan Nolta, director of the Stem Cell Program at UC-Davis, who has been appointed to oversee the human trials. As Dr. Owens explains, "Part of our mission is to do basic science and clinical trials and also improve ways of processing cells."

Similarly, VetCell of the U.K. initially chose to focus specifically on tendon injuries in horses precisely because these injuries bear such a close resemblance to the same injuries in humans, and therefore the medical procedures should be easily translatable from veterinary to human medicine. In fact, while damage to a rotator cuff or an Achilles tendon would certainly be extremely painful in a human, it probably would not be fatal, whereas such injuries in a horse could prove fatal. The veterinary procedures have therefore had to advance very carefully and meticulously – despite the absence of a controlling government regulatory system – merely because of the severe and extreme nature of such animal injuries. Next year, VetCell plans to begin autologous adult stem cell therapy for human patients with Achilles tendon damage, which will mark VetCell’s first human clinical trials in which an equine procedure will be translated to a human procedure. As with the horses, the human autologous adult stem cells will be derived from each human patient’s own bone marrow, from which the stem cells will then be isolated, purified, expanded and readministered to the patient therapeutically, usually by injection directly into the area of tissue damage. According to Dr. Mountford, "Our long-term goal is to use it to treat a number of tendon injuries."

Likewise, Vet-Stem of California has already demonstrated success in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with autologous adult stem cells in the treatment of arthritic dogs. As Dr. Robert Harman, veterinarian and founding CEO of the company, points out, "About 200,000 hip replacements are done every year in humans. That’s a very good target for someone to look at cell therapy." Adipose-derived stem cells have been shown in a number of studies to exhibit highly beneficial immunomodulatory properties – which reduce inflammation, among other benefits – in addition to stimulating the regeneration of cartilage and other tissue. (E.g., "Non-expanded adipose stromal vascular fraction cell therapy for multiple sclerosis", by N.H. Riordan et al., published in the Journal of Translational Medicine in April of 2009, of which Dr. Harman is a coauthor). As Dr. Harman further explains, "In the last couple of years, evidence has come out that the cells we use reduce inflammation and pain, and help lubricate the joint."

Ordinarily, injuries of the bones, joints, tendons and ligaments result in scarring of the tissue, which not only prevents full healing but also often leads to further injuries at a later time. Conventional medical therapies do nothing to address the problem of scar tissue directly, and surgical procedures actually make the problem worse by increasing the severity of tissue scarring which in turn merely exacerbates later complications that will inevitably result from the scar tissue, since such tissue can never be fully rehabilitated. Stem cell therapy, however, allows for the full and complete healing of tissue without scarring, which not only reduces the risk of re-injury of the same tissue at a later date but also restores full physical performance and function, usually very quickly and dramatically. Such is the case in humans as well as in animals. As Dr. Harman succinctly states, "Our success in animals is directly translatable to humans, and we wish to share our evidence that stem cells are safe and effective."

Although Vet-Stem was the first company to commercialize the process in the U.S., and VetCell was the first to do so in the U.K., a number of other companies throughout the world are now also utilizing similar types of technology in which adult stem cells are derived from each animal’s own tissue and readministered to the animal as a clinical therapy for the particular medical condition from which the animal suffers. Autologous adult stem cell therapy has proven to be a highly preferable alternative treatment for many animals, especially those whose conditions require surgery or anti-inflammatory drugs, both of which can often be avoided with the stem cell therapy.

Vet-Stem was founded in 2002 as the result of stem cell research conducted at the University of Pittsburgh and UCLA in the late 1990s, when Dr. Bob Harman saw the commercial potential for veterinary applications of such stem cell technology. A veterinarian himself, as well as a statistician and former biotech entrepreneur who had already held the top executive title at 3 biotechnology companies prior to Vet-Stem, Dr. Harman is now the CEO of Vet-Stem as well as one of its founders. Based in San Diego, Vet-Stem patterned its initial clinical model upon the example of other companies that were already involved in human adult stem cell therapies, such as Cytori Therapeutics which had developed a proprietary separation apparatus that harvests human adult stem cells from adipose tissue at the patient’s bedside during reconstructive or cosmetic surgery. In a similar procedure, veterinarians extract approximately 2 to 3 tablespoons of adipose tissue from each animal, which are then sent to Vet-Stem’s laboratories where the adult stem cells are isolated, purified, expanded and returned within 48 hours to the veterinarian who then administers the stem cells to the animal. The procedure has demonstrated a consistently high success rate and its use is becoming increasingly widespread not only for horses but also for dogs. Among other partnerships, in September of 2007 Vet-Stem licensed their proprietary adult stem cell technology to the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL) of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, thereby allowing the CVRL to offer the same adipose-derived adult stem cell animal therapies throughout the Middle East. Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai and the Prime Minister of the UAE, is an avid thoroughbred owner and a sponsor of the Dubai World Cup, the world’s most highly-prized horse race. As Dr. Harman described in 2007, "The Central Veterinary Research Laboratory will be an excellent partner in bringing this technology from the U.S. to the Middle East as they are already the most respected reference lab in the region." CVRL now provides stem cell services for the treatment of injuries not only in thoroughbred race horses and Arabian endurance horses, but also in racing camels, among other species, throughout the Middle East. As already mentioned, to date Vet-Stem has treated over 3,000 horses and over 2,000 dogs with joint injuries and degenerative conditions that include tendon and ligament injuries as well as age-related osteoarthritis. Vet-Stem’s overall success rate is around 80% in the number of animals who are able to return to normal performance, a rate that is significantly above that of conventional surgical and pharmaceutical therapies.

VetCell Bioscience developed the equine autologous adult stem cell procedure in the U.K., where such therapy is now routine practice at most equine veterinary locations and is even covered by most equine insurance policies. VetCell uses mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that are derived from the animal’s own bone marrow which is extracted from the horse’s sternum, from which the MSCs are then isolated, expanded to more than 10 million cells, re-suspended in bone marrow supernatant which is rich in growth factors and other chemical nutrients, and then the cells are injected directly into the site of the injury where the cells regenerate the tendon tissue and also prevent the formation of scar tissue, which is often a main hindrance to healing and the cause of future reinjury. Physical rehabilitation and a controlled exercise program are also important to the recovery of the horse, and periodic MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans are taken to monitor the healing. VetCell Bioscience specializes in the development and commercialization of new biotechnologies for veterinarian musculoskeletal regeneration. VetCell was formed in partnership with the Royal Veterinary College and the Institute for Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, and is a trading company within MedCell Bioscience, its parent company, which develops musculoskeletal regenerative therapeutics for human clinical treatment. As stated on their website, "VetCell has rapidly commercialised a technique for the multiplication of equine stem cells which can be used in the treatment of tendon and ligament injury. This service is now available to veterinary surgeons in the U.K. and internationally. VetCell has also developed a simple method for separating and storing stem cells from the umbilical cords of foals." Although VetCell specializes in the treatment of horse injuries, they are also expanding their services and products to therapeutic applications for dogs, cats and other domestic species, in addition to their human clinical trials which will commence next year. Headquartered in Cambridge, England with laboratories in Edinburgh, Scotland, MedCell and VetCell also have offices in Germany, Spain, China, Australia, South America, Canada and the United States.

Both Vet-Stem and VetCell use exclusively adult stem cells, derived from each animal’s own tissue. Since the cells are autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same animal), there is no risk of immune rejection. More specifically, the stem cells that are harvested in both procedures are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are highly potent adult stem cells that are found not only in bone marrow and adipose tissue but also umbilical cord blood. Numerous scientific and clinical studies have been published in the peer-reviewed medical literature detailing the regenerative properties of MSCs.

No embryonic stem cells are ever used in either Vet-Stem’s or VetCell’s therapies, since embryonic stem cells are highly problematic in the laboratory, whether they are of human or non-human origin. Among other problems, the risk of teratoma (tumor) formation disqualifies embryonic stem cells for use as a clinical therapy, even in animals. Adult stem cells, however, do not pose such risks and are therefore rapidly accumulating a consistent history of successful clinical treatments in veterinary, as well as in human, medicine.

NIH received varied responses, some poignant, on stem-cell draft

President Obama issued Executive Order 13505 on March 9, 2009, to establish policy and procedures under which NIH (National Institutes of Health) will fund research in the area of embryonic stem cells. Previously, embryonic stem cell research was legal in the US, as long as it was not funded by the NIH. However, NIH funded research in embryonic stem cells could be conducted as long as it involved existing embryonic stem cell lines, and not creation of new ones. As a response to the Executive Order, the NIH generated draft Guidelines that would allow funding for research using human embryonic stem cells that were derived from embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for reproductive purposes and were no longer needed for that purpose.

There were approximately 49,000 comments sent into the NIH in response to a publicly available draft of the new guidelines to embryonic stem cell research (see for yourself at http://grants.nih.gov/stem_cells/web_listing.htm). According to the article by Nancy Frazier O’Brien of the Catholic News Service, although many of them were repetitive, some made clear the point that destruction of human embryos should not be permitted. For example, one comment was:

"As a mother of a child with juvenile diabetes, I certainly hope we find a cure for this terrible disease in her lifetime," wrote one woman. "However, I am not willing to sacrifice the life of ONE CHILD, let alone thousands or even more in the name of research.

Currently much research is being performed on embryonic stem cells in order to develop treatments and eventually cures for diseases that currently are incurable. At least this dream is what inspires many to support embryonic stem cell research. Unfortunately, much of the political debate, at least in our opinion, seems to be just that: politics.

The whole purpose of medical research is the development of new treatment that help people. This is not to say that there is something wrong with doing research for the sake of doing research. After all, many of the greatest advancements of humanity came about by accident when people were not looking for them. So there is a point to doing basic research for the sake of basic research. However, the media and the political debates around embryonic stem cells are giving the impression that if people do not support embryonic stem cells, they are not supporting cures for their children with diabetes, or their parents with Alzheimer’s or Michael J Fox’s Parkinson’s. In fact, nothing could be farther from the truth.

The field of embryonic stem cell research is based on the finding that if one takes a fertilized egg and extracts specific cells after the fertilized egg has developed to a certain point, these cells, can give rise to every cell in the body. Interestingly, these "master cells" can be grown in high quantities under special conditions so that they can be used for experiments. For example, these embryonic stem cells can be treated with certain chemicals and make muscle cells in the test tube. These cells can be treated with other chemicals and make brain cells in the test tube. These cells can make almost any cell known to mankind when manipulated in the test tube. This sounds very exciting. This is why many people are very excited about embryonic stem cell research.

Now the problem is a little more complex.

When these "master cells", these embryonic stem cells, are placed into a mouse that has been induced to have a heart attack, what happens to these cells? Unfortunately, what happens, is that the mouse developed more inflammation, or some mice develop a cancer called a teratoma. So the beautiful and exciting work in the test tube, has so far largely failed to produce therapeutic results in animals. We know that cancer has been cured in animals for decades now, yet some many humans still die of cancer. If we can not induce cures in animals with embryonic stem cells, then how likely are we to induce cures in humans in the near future?

Exactly. The point that embryonic stem cell advocates make, the ones that have some familiarity with medical science (which most don’t), is that just because embryonic stem cells are not useful today does not been that they will not be useful tomorrow. That research dollars need to be spent on embryonic stem cells so that one day they may be useful.

We can not argue with the point of supporting basic research. However, our position is that basic research should be seen as basic research and should not be transformed into a "religion".

There are several points that need to be made that are not made out of belief, or politics, or even religion, but are based on scientific facts:

Firstly, embryonic stem cells have made medical progress already. The creation of genetically engineered mice (knockouts and transgenics) was soley dependent on mouse embryonic stem cells. Practically everything we know scientifically about the function of molecules in living things has been derived from these animals. Accordingly, the blanket statement that embryonic stem cells have produced no benefits is incorrect.

Secondly, adult stem cells have been used already in patients with various degrees of success. For example, in patients with heart failure, analysis of over 1000 patients indicated overall improvement of heart function. Now where would money and funds be better spend? Taking something that seems to work and making it applicable to everyone, or chasing a distant dream?

Thirdly, embryonic stem cell research, from a scientific perspective, is rapidly becoming obsolete. The moral and ethical issues surrounding embryonic stem cells arise from the need to destroy the embryo to extract the embryonic stem cells. The new technology called inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPS) allows for the generation of brand new embryonic-like stem cells from skin, bone marrow, brain, and pretty much any other tissue. What many supporters of embryonic stem cells do not know is that iPS cells are more attractive to scientists because: a) they can be easily generated; b) they offer potential to make "brand new", "clean" cells, without having to rely on embryonic stem cells that are years old and have undefined characteristics; and c) iPS cells allow the possibility to make stem cells from the same patient.

On July 6th, 2009 Dr. Raynard S. Kington, acting NIH director, made final the guidelines and approved funding for research involving the creation of new ES cells. The question now becomes how much of the funding should support ES research and how much support with the other stem cell technologies be given, the technologies that actually seem to be inducing benefit in people today?

Boston’s biotech community leads wave of stem cell consolidation, deal making

Today at the ISSCR Meeting in Barcelona, the merger of two stem cell companies, IZumi Bio and Pierian Inc was announced, with the new company being named IPierian. According to the new company’s website iPierian is

"…a pioneering biopharmaceutical company that is taking the cutting-edge technologies of cellular reprogramming and directed differentiation to an entirely new level to harness the power of induced pluripotent stem cells to advance the understanding of human diseases and accelerate the discovery of more effective therapeutics for patients"

The two precursor companies, iZumi and Pierian, both had synergistic skills in the area of inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPS), a type of "artificial stem cell" that is created from skin or other tissues. The use of iPS cells for therapeutics development is more attractive to scientists than embryonic stem cells for several reasons. Firstly, iPS cells can be generated to be patient-specific, thus overcoming problems with need for taking of immune suppressants. Currently embryonic stem cells can not be used in patients for several reasons, and the few times that their use is contemplated, the patient is sentenced to taking life-long immune suppression so that they do not undergo rejection. Secondly, iPS cells can be generated under highly defined conditions. Embryonic stem cells that are currently used have been developed years ago and face various problems such as the fact that many of them have previously been grown on mouse cells or using animal products. In contrast, iPS cells can be generated with relatively little effort.

iZumi was supported by the venture capital groups Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and LExington, Mass.-based Highland Capital Partners with a $20 million investment, whereas Pierian was founded by MPM Capital managing directors Ashley Dombkowski and Robert Millman as well as Harvard University scientists. The new company, which will be led by John Walker as CEO and Corey Goodman, as Chairman, raised an additional $10 million from Boston-based MPM Capital and $1.5 million from FinTech Capital Partners.

Initial goals of the company will be use of the iPS cells to address disease affecting the central nervous system that have no effective treatment such as spinal muscular atrophy, Parkinson’s Disease, and ALS. In the long-run the company plans to investigate conditions such as heart failure, liver failure, and diabetes. As part of the new company’s strategy, it will seek synergistic collaborations with established market players.

Despite the aggressive goals the company has set for itself, there are several drawbacks that one must consider. Firstly, pluripotent stem cells, regardless of whether they are iPS or embryonic stem cells, all cause cancer when administered into animals. iPS may be especially dangerous since oncogenes (genes that cause cancer) are needed for the creation of these cells. In order for iPS to be used safely, it will be necessary to make sure that the cells being made for injection are completely the cells that one wants, and no contamination with the original iPS cells. In other words, if one is treating Parkinson’s Disease, one can not simply inject iPS cells into the area of the brain that is damaged, since this conceptually will form a tumor. In contrast, one would have to "teach" the iPS cells to become the specific cell that is damaged in Parkinson’s Disease, called the "dopaminergic neuron", one will have to concentrate these cells outside of the body, and then inject them directly where they are needed. Once the cells are injected, they will have to form connections with the existing cells and subsequently integrate and take over their function. This is in contrast to the present-day clinically available adult stem cell therapies, where in many cases adult stem cells are injected either intraviously or intrathecally, and the natural signals of the body instruct them to differentiate into the needed tissue. Although differentiation efficacy of adult stem cells may be lower on a per cell basis, of the thousands of people that have been treated with adult stem cells no reports of tumor formation exist.

iPierian’s scientific leadership comes from the respected embryonic stem cell experts Dr. George Daley, Douglas Melton and Lee Rubin who are faculty at Harvard. The scientific advisory board (SAB) of the company will be chaired by Dr. George Daley, and will include Amy Wagers, Kevin Eggan, Benoit Bruneau, and Matthias Hebrok.