Veterinary Stem Cell Therapies Translate into Human Therapies

As previously reported on this website a number of times, rapid progress has been made over the past few years in veterinary medicine using autologous adult stem cells. Now, the consistent success of such therapy is finally getting the attention of the human medical community, which is beginning to replicate the veterinary procedures in human clinical trials.

Autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same individual, whether a person or a dog or a horse) adult stem cell therapy has been routinely used in recent years for the treatment of a variety of conditions in large domesticated animals. Such conditions most commonly include orthopedic injuries in competitive horses, while in dogs the most commonly treated condition is age-related degenerative osteoarthritis. Although such stem cell therapies could also be of benefit to smaller animals such as cats, orthopedic injuries are not usually life-threatening to these smaller animals whereas such an injury could be fatal for a thoroughbred race horse. Consequently, veterinary stem cell therapy has been applied very aggressively to these valuable, expensive, large animals whose lives and competitive careers have literally been saved by such therapies. Even for dogs who do not earn large salaries in high-profile competitions but who are merely beloved pets, autologous adult stem cell therapy has also proven to be life-saving. Meanwhile, in human medicine, however, nothing whatsoever has been allowed to happen in U.S. clinics outside of a small number of government-approved clinical trials, thanks to an outdated, lengthy, lethargic and prohibitively expensive FDA approval process. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that veterinary stem cell medicine has quickly outpaced human stem cell medicine – but now, at last, humans are beginning to learn something from their canine and equine friends.

Companies such as Vet-Stem in the U.S. and VetCell in the U.K. have accumulated numerous documented cases of the benefits of autologous adult stem cell therapy in animals. To name just a few of the advantages, adult stem cell therapy yields faster healing and shorter recovery times than surgical treatments do, and adult stem cell therapy does not pose a risk of any side effects like medications do. Additionally, since the adult stem cells are autologous, there is no risk of immune injection. The U.K. company VetCell derives the autologous adult stem cells from the animal’s bone marrow, and to date has treated approximately 1,700 horses with an 80% success rate. By comparison, the U.S. company Vet-Stem derives the autologous adult stem cells from the animal’s adipose (fat) tissue, and to date has treated over 2,000 dogs and over 3,000 horses, also with an 80% success rate. With both companies, the procedure is quick, simple, and minimally invasive. Although the treatment is more expensive than conventional veterinary procedures, the adult stem cell treatment actually works, and noticeable improvement is seen almost immediately in all cases, not just in the 80% of cases that exhibit a complete recovery. By sharp contrast, however, conventional surgical and pharmacological therapies, which might initially be less expensive than stem cell therapy, only have a 30% success rate and therefore in the long-term are actually more expensive when repeated treatment is needed, or when improvements are not seen at all. Additionally, reinjury is significantly lower in animals who receive autologous adult stem cell therapy, due to the mechanism of action by which these stem cells activate the healing process. As Dr. David Mountford, a veterinary surgeon and chief operating officer at VetCell, explains, "After 3 years, the reinjury rate was much lower in stem-cell-treated animals: about 23% compared with the published average of 56%" for animals treated with conventional therapies.

According to Dr. Sean Owens, veterinarian and founding director of the Regenerative Medicine Laboratory at UC-Davis, "Soft-tissue injury is the number-one injury competitive horses will suffer, and it can end a thoroughbred horse’s career." Additionally, Dr. Owens adds, "Regulatory oversight of veterinary medicine is minimal. For the most part, the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) have not waded into the regulatory arena for us." Precisely because of such a lack of federal government regulation in the veterinary industry, this newly created research center which Dr. Owens has established is able to dedicate itself to the advancement of animal stem cell medicine, which in turn should translate into the advancement of human stem cell medicine through parallel clinical trials. A number of ongoing clinical trials in horses are conducted at the Laboratory, which include those for tendon tears and those for fractured bone chips in the knee – and now a similar type of autologous adult stem cell therapy for these same conditions will be developed for human clinical trials. Ultimately, such a program will result not only in the development of better treatments for horses, but also in the development of better treatments for humans. Currently Dr. Owens is collaborating with Dr. Jan Nolta, director of the Stem Cell Program at UC-Davis, who has been appointed to oversee the human trials. As Dr. Owens explains, "Part of our mission is to do basic science and clinical trials and also improve ways of processing cells."

Similarly, VetCell of the U.K. initially chose to focus specifically on tendon injuries in horses precisely because these injuries bear such a close resemblance to the same injuries in humans, and therefore the medical procedures should be easily translatable from veterinary to human medicine. In fact, while damage to a rotator cuff or an Achilles tendon would certainly be extremely painful in a human, it probably would not be fatal, whereas such injuries in a horse could prove fatal. The veterinary procedures have therefore had to advance very carefully and meticulously – despite the absence of a controlling government regulatory system – merely because of the severe and extreme nature of such animal injuries. Next year, VetCell plans to begin autologous adult stem cell therapy for human patients with Achilles tendon damage, which will mark VetCell’s first human clinical trials in which an equine procedure will be translated to a human procedure. As with the horses, the human autologous adult stem cells will be derived from each human patient’s own bone marrow, from which the stem cells will then be isolated, purified, expanded and readministered to the patient therapeutically, usually by injection directly into the area of tissue damage. According to Dr. Mountford, "Our long-term goal is to use it to treat a number of tendon injuries."

Likewise, Vet-Stem of California has already demonstrated success in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with autologous adult stem cells in the treatment of arthritic dogs. As Dr. Robert Harman, veterinarian and founding CEO of the company, points out, "About 200,000 hip replacements are done every year in humans. That’s a very good target for someone to look at cell therapy." Adipose-derived stem cells have been shown in a number of studies to exhibit highly beneficial immunomodulatory properties – which reduce inflammation, among other benefits – in addition to stimulating the regeneration of cartilage and other tissue. (E.g., "Non-expanded adipose stromal vascular fraction cell therapy for multiple sclerosis", by N.H. Riordan et al., published in the Journal of Translational Medicine in April of 2009, of which Dr. Harman is a coauthor). As Dr. Harman further explains, "In the last couple of years, evidence has come out that the cells we use reduce inflammation and pain, and help lubricate the joint."

Ordinarily, injuries of the bones, joints, tendons and ligaments result in scarring of the tissue, which not only prevents full healing but also often leads to further injuries at a later time. Conventional medical therapies do nothing to address the problem of scar tissue directly, and surgical procedures actually make the problem worse by increasing the severity of tissue scarring which in turn merely exacerbates later complications that will inevitably result from the scar tissue, since such tissue can never be fully rehabilitated. Stem cell therapy, however, allows for the full and complete healing of tissue without scarring, which not only reduces the risk of re-injury of the same tissue at a later date but also restores full physical performance and function, usually very quickly and dramatically. Such is the case in humans as well as in animals. As Dr. Harman succinctly states, "Our success in animals is directly translatable to humans, and we wish to share our evidence that stem cells are safe and effective."

Although Vet-Stem was the first company to commercialize the process in the U.S., and VetCell was the first to do so in the U.K., a number of other companies throughout the world are now also utilizing similar types of technology in which adult stem cells are derived from each animal’s own tissue and readministered to the animal as a clinical therapy for the particular medical condition from which the animal suffers. Autologous adult stem cell therapy has proven to be a highly preferable alternative treatment for many animals, especially those whose conditions require surgery or anti-inflammatory drugs, both of which can often be avoided with the stem cell therapy.

Vet-Stem was founded in 2002 as the result of stem cell research conducted at the University of Pittsburgh and UCLA in the late 1990s, when Dr. Bob Harman saw the commercial potential for veterinary applications of such stem cell technology. A veterinarian himself, as well as a statistician and former biotech entrepreneur who had already held the top executive title at 3 biotechnology companies prior to Vet-Stem, Dr. Harman is now the CEO of Vet-Stem as well as one of its founders. Based in San Diego, Vet-Stem patterned its initial clinical model upon the example of other companies that were already involved in human adult stem cell therapies, such as Cytori Therapeutics which had developed a proprietary separation apparatus that harvests human adult stem cells from adipose tissue at the patient’s bedside during reconstructive or cosmetic surgery. In a similar procedure, veterinarians extract approximately 2 to 3 tablespoons of adipose tissue from each animal, which are then sent to Vet-Stem’s laboratories where the adult stem cells are isolated, purified, expanded and returned within 48 hours to the veterinarian who then administers the stem cells to the animal. The procedure has demonstrated a consistently high success rate and its use is becoming increasingly widespread not only for horses but also for dogs. Among other partnerships, in September of 2007 Vet-Stem licensed their proprietary adult stem cell technology to the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL) of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, thereby allowing the CVRL to offer the same adipose-derived adult stem cell animal therapies throughout the Middle East. Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai and the Prime Minister of the UAE, is an avid thoroughbred owner and a sponsor of the Dubai World Cup, the world’s most highly-prized horse race. As Dr. Harman described in 2007, "The Central Veterinary Research Laboratory will be an excellent partner in bringing this technology from the U.S. to the Middle East as they are already the most respected reference lab in the region." CVRL now provides stem cell services for the treatment of injuries not only in thoroughbred race horses and Arabian endurance horses, but also in racing camels, among other species, throughout the Middle East. As already mentioned, to date Vet-Stem has treated over 3,000 horses and over 2,000 dogs with joint injuries and degenerative conditions that include tendon and ligament injuries as well as age-related osteoarthritis. Vet-Stem’s overall success rate is around 80% in the number of animals who are able to return to normal performance, a rate that is significantly above that of conventional surgical and pharmaceutical therapies.

VetCell Bioscience developed the equine autologous adult stem cell procedure in the U.K., where such therapy is now routine practice at most equine veterinary locations and is even covered by most equine insurance policies. VetCell uses mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that are derived from the animal’s own bone marrow which is extracted from the horse’s sternum, from which the MSCs are then isolated, expanded to more than 10 million cells, re-suspended in bone marrow supernatant which is rich in growth factors and other chemical nutrients, and then the cells are injected directly into the site of the injury where the cells regenerate the tendon tissue and also prevent the formation of scar tissue, which is often a main hindrance to healing and the cause of future reinjury. Physical rehabilitation and a controlled exercise program are also important to the recovery of the horse, and periodic MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans are taken to monitor the healing. VetCell Bioscience specializes in the development and commercialization of new biotechnologies for veterinarian musculoskeletal regeneration. VetCell was formed in partnership with the Royal Veterinary College and the Institute for Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Science, and is a trading company within MedCell Bioscience, its parent company, which develops musculoskeletal regenerative therapeutics for human clinical treatment. As stated on their website, "VetCell has rapidly commercialised a technique for the multiplication of equine stem cells which can be used in the treatment of tendon and ligament injury. This service is now available to veterinary surgeons in the U.K. and internationally. VetCell has also developed a simple method for separating and storing stem cells from the umbilical cords of foals." Although VetCell specializes in the treatment of horse injuries, they are also expanding their services and products to therapeutic applications for dogs, cats and other domestic species, in addition to their human clinical trials which will commence next year. Headquartered in Cambridge, England with laboratories in Edinburgh, Scotland, MedCell and VetCell also have offices in Germany, Spain, China, Australia, South America, Canada and the United States.

Both Vet-Stem and VetCell use exclusively adult stem cells, derived from each animal’s own tissue. Since the cells are autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same animal), there is no risk of immune rejection. More specifically, the stem cells that are harvested in both procedures are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are highly potent adult stem cells that are found not only in bone marrow and adipose tissue but also umbilical cord blood. Numerous scientific and clinical studies have been published in the peer-reviewed medical literature detailing the regenerative properties of MSCs.

No embryonic stem cells are ever used in either Vet-Stem’s or VetCell’s therapies, since embryonic stem cells are highly problematic in the laboratory, whether they are of human or non-human origin. Among other problems, the risk of teratoma (tumor) formation disqualifies embryonic stem cells for use as a clinical therapy, even in animals. Adult stem cells, however, do not pose such risks and are therefore rapidly accumulating a consistent history of successful clinical treatments in veterinary, as well as in human, medicine.

New NIH Stem Cell Guidelines are Slowing Research

According to Dr. Steve Duncan, professor of human and molecular genetics at the Medical College of Wisconsin, the failure of the new NIH Guidelines to "grandfather" in the already existing hESC lines has had a "tremendously detrimental effect on our research."

As Dr. Duncan explains, "The problem is they haven’t added the presidential lines as a group of lines that we can now use. So we can’t do any human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research with new federal funds at this point. We’re hoping within the next two months that it will be relaxed, but that’s a long time in research and it’s reallly upsetting, the way it’s been handled."

Once again, as previously reported a number of times on this website, at the heart of the debate are the "voluntary and informed consent" rules which are contained within the new NIH Guidelines. Many, if not all, of the hESC lines that already exist were created before such rules of consent were authored, and therefore do not meet "the core ethical principles and procedures" that are defined in the new NIH Guidelines. Even though NIH says that such hESCs are subject to review by an advisory committee and might therefore be "grandfathered" in, there is still widespread doubt among the ESC scientific community that many of those lines will be approved for the federal funding of research.

In fact, contrary to popular opinion, there is one major obstacle in the U.S. which is preventing stem cell therapies from being available in clinics at this very moment, and that obstacle has nothing to do with NIH nor with embryonic stem cells nor with any restrictions that the Bush administration supposedly imposed nor with any restrictions that the Obama administration supposedly lifted. Instead, that one, single, primary obstacle is the fact that the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has decreed that autologus (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells are a "drug", and therefore must be regulated as such, and therefore cannot be used for therapeutic purposes in the U.S. without having first been subjected to the lengthy, lethargic, outdated, multi-year, multi-million dollar federal governmental approval process, in the same manner as which pharmaceutically manufactured drugs are regulated. Such a stance is without any scientific basis whatsoever, and a number of individuals and organizations are attempting to initiate a much-needed and long-overdue reform of the FDA on this issue. Until the FDA is completely overhauled, however, it seems as though U.S. academicians will continue to focus all of their time and attention on arguing over the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research while apparently remaining oblivious to the fact that doctors and patients are not willing to sit around and wait another decade for something to happen, but instead are traveling overseas where adult stem cell therapies are already available in clinics in just about every country in the world except the United States. (Please see the related news articles on this website, entitled, "Arizona Man Travels to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy", dated July 16, 2009; "Bangor Family Heads to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy", dated July 8, 2009; "Texas Woman Travels to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Treatment", dated June 25, 2009, and "Two U.S. Adult Stem Cell Companies Form Collaboration in Asia", dated May 11, 2009).

Despite all the exaggerated hype over embryonic stem cells, usually at the complete exclusion of adult stem cells, Dr. Duncan nevertheless predicts that future stem cell research will shift more toward adult rather than embryonic stem cells, and not just for the numerous sound scientific and medical reasons but also for ethical reasons as well. Despite his own interest in hESC research at the moment, he also pointed out that, "I think we have to take into account the ethical situation."

BioTime Receives Second Round of Funding

Following a series of recent press releases, BioTime Inc. has announced that two of its shareholders have completed funding of the second tranche of their equity investments by exercising their rights to purchase additional warrants and shares in the company.

Specifically, George Karfunkel and Broadwood Partners, L.P. have each purchased an additional 1,100,000 shares of common stock and 1,100,000 stock purchase warrants, which therefore yielded a cumulative payment of $4,000,000 to BioTime. Although substantially equivalent to the publically traded stock, BioTime’s warrants entitle the investors to the right to purchase additional common shares at an exercise price of $2 per share, before the expiration date of the warrants which is October 31, 2010.

According to Michael West, Ph.D., CEO of BioTime, "The $8,000,000 of new equity capital we have raised since May from these investors, plus our $4,700,000 research grant from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, will be available to finance our strategic programs to build our product and technology portfolios in the emerging fields of stem cell research and regenerative medicine. BioTime’s recent steps toward creating an independent board of directors and raising additional capital are consistent with our goal of establishing BioTime as a leader in the emerging field of regenerative medicine, and are necessary steps in qualifying the Company for relisting on a national exchange. BioTime could receive more than $24,000,000 of additional equity capital if all of its class of publicly traded warrants and the warrants sold to Broadwood Partners, L.P. and Mr. Karfunkel are ultimately exercised prior to the October 2010 expiration date."

Headquarterd in Alameda, California, BioTime is focused on the development and commercialization of technology and products related to blood plasma volume expanders for use in emergency trauma treatment, surgery and related applications. Its wholly owned subsidiary Embryome Sciences is "focused on developing an array of research and therapeutic products using human embryonic stem cell technology", as described on the personal website of Michael West, Ph.D., molecular gerontologist and BioTime’s CEO. Prior to his work with BioTime, Dr. West founded the Geron Corporation, which received FDA approval earlier this year to commence the first human clinical trials ever to be conducted with hESCs.

Contrary to widespread misconception, embryonic stem cell research has been alive and well for years in the U.S., even throughout the entirety of the Bush administration, and nowhere is there a better example of this fact than in the continued funding by private investors of embryonic stem cell companies such as BioTime and Geron. Such investors apparently have unlimited supplies of patience as well as money, however, since embryonic stem cell research has yet to yield any concrete, tangible results which can actually be applied to clinical therapies.

BioTime’s stock closed slightly higher today, at $3.20.

(Please see the related news articles on this website, including those entitled, "New Members Added to BioTime’s Board of Directors", dated July 7, 2009, and "BioTime Announces Agreement With Millipore", dated July 9, 2009).

NIH received varied responses, some poignant, on stem-cell draft

President Obama issued Executive Order 13505 on March 9, 2009, to establish policy and procedures under which NIH (National Institutes of Health) will fund research in the area of embryonic stem cells. Previously, embryonic stem cell research was legal in the US, as long as it was not funded by the NIH. However, NIH funded research in embryonic stem cells could be conducted as long as it involved existing embryonic stem cell lines, and not creation of new ones. As a response to the Executive Order, the NIH generated draft Guidelines that would allow funding for research using human embryonic stem cells that were derived from embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for reproductive purposes and were no longer needed for that purpose.

There were approximately 49,000 comments sent into the NIH in response to a publicly available draft of the new guidelines to embryonic stem cell research (see for yourself at http://grants.nih.gov/stem_cells/web_listing.htm). According to the article by Nancy Frazier O’Brien of the Catholic News Service, although many of them were repetitive, some made clear the point that destruction of human embryos should not be permitted. For example, one comment was:

"As a mother of a child with juvenile diabetes, I certainly hope we find a cure for this terrible disease in her lifetime," wrote one woman. "However, I am not willing to sacrifice the life of ONE CHILD, let alone thousands or even more in the name of research.

Currently much research is being performed on embryonic stem cells in order to develop treatments and eventually cures for diseases that currently are incurable. At least this dream is what inspires many to support embryonic stem cell research. Unfortunately, much of the political debate, at least in our opinion, seems to be just that: politics.

The whole purpose of medical research is the development of new treatment that help people. This is not to say that there is something wrong with doing research for the sake of doing research. After all, many of the greatest advancements of humanity came about by accident when people were not looking for them. So there is a point to doing basic research for the sake of basic research. However, the media and the political debates around embryonic stem cells are giving the impression that if people do not support embryonic stem cells, they are not supporting cures for their children with diabetes, or their parents with Alzheimer’s or Michael J Fox’s Parkinson’s. In fact, nothing could be farther from the truth.

The field of embryonic stem cell research is based on the finding that if one takes a fertilized egg and extracts specific cells after the fertilized egg has developed to a certain point, these cells, can give rise to every cell in the body. Interestingly, these "master cells" can be grown in high quantities under special conditions so that they can be used for experiments. For example, these embryonic stem cells can be treated with certain chemicals and make muscle cells in the test tube. These cells can be treated with other chemicals and make brain cells in the test tube. These cells can make almost any cell known to mankind when manipulated in the test tube. This sounds very exciting. This is why many people are very excited about embryonic stem cell research.

Now the problem is a little more complex.

When these "master cells", these embryonic stem cells, are placed into a mouse that has been induced to have a heart attack, what happens to these cells? Unfortunately, what happens, is that the mouse developed more inflammation, or some mice develop a cancer called a teratoma. So the beautiful and exciting work in the test tube, has so far largely failed to produce therapeutic results in animals. We know that cancer has been cured in animals for decades now, yet some many humans still die of cancer. If we can not induce cures in animals with embryonic stem cells, then how likely are we to induce cures in humans in the near future?

Exactly. The point that embryonic stem cell advocates make, the ones that have some familiarity with medical science (which most don’t), is that just because embryonic stem cells are not useful today does not been that they will not be useful tomorrow. That research dollars need to be spent on embryonic stem cells so that one day they may be useful.

We can not argue with the point of supporting basic research. However, our position is that basic research should be seen as basic research and should not be transformed into a "religion".

There are several points that need to be made that are not made out of belief, or politics, or even religion, but are based on scientific facts:

Firstly, embryonic stem cells have made medical progress already. The creation of genetically engineered mice (knockouts and transgenics) was soley dependent on mouse embryonic stem cells. Practically everything we know scientifically about the function of molecules in living things has been derived from these animals. Accordingly, the blanket statement that embryonic stem cells have produced no benefits is incorrect.

Secondly, adult stem cells have been used already in patients with various degrees of success. For example, in patients with heart failure, analysis of over 1000 patients indicated overall improvement of heart function. Now where would money and funds be better spend? Taking something that seems to work and making it applicable to everyone, or chasing a distant dream?

Thirdly, embryonic stem cell research, from a scientific perspective, is rapidly becoming obsolete. The moral and ethical issues surrounding embryonic stem cells arise from the need to destroy the embryo to extract the embryonic stem cells. The new technology called inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPS) allows for the generation of brand new embryonic-like stem cells from skin, bone marrow, brain, and pretty much any other tissue. What many supporters of embryonic stem cells do not know is that iPS cells are more attractive to scientists because: a) they can be easily generated; b) they offer potential to make "brand new", "clean" cells, without having to rely on embryonic stem cells that are years old and have undefined characteristics; and c) iPS cells allow the possibility to make stem cells from the same patient.

On July 6th, 2009 Dr. Raynard S. Kington, acting NIH director, made final the guidelines and approved funding for research involving the creation of new ES cells. The question now becomes how much of the funding should support ES research and how much support with the other stem cell technologies be given, the technologies that actually seem to be inducing benefit in people today?

New Technology Breakthroughs Showcased at Annual Stem Cell Conference

The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) is hosting its 7th annual conference this week, from July 8 – 11, which takes place this year in Barcelona, Spain.

Amidst the excitement over new developments in stem cell biology itself are the latest developments in computer, electrical and chemical engineering which are driving the laboratory technology that makes the biological research possible.

The optoelectronics company, BD Biosciences of San Diego, for example, is demonstrating two of its latest products at this year’s ISSCR conference, both of which incorporate new methods of utilizing flow cytometry for the sorting and analysis of near-pure populations of stem cells, such as those of adult origin including those derived from neurons, as well as undifferentiated stem cells such as those of human embryonic (hESCs) origin. First described in a study entitled, "Isolation of a near-pure population of hESC-derived neurons using CD markers and fluorescence activated cell sorting", the new flow cytometry screening technique assesses 192 antibodies to surface cell markers in order to identify a "signature" that distinguishes between the various types of stem cells.

As Dr. Christian Carson of BD Biosciences explains, "Our study results help address a key challenge in the development of assays that will benefit from consistent, defined neural cell types. In addition, these findings have implications beyond neural stem cells. They provide a framework of how to use flow cytometry analysis screens and sorting methods to quickly identify and isolate a variety of stem cells and their derivatives." After cell sorting has been completed, the second method applies p160-Rho-associated coiled kinase (ROCK) inhibitor to enhance cell survival in various growth conditions, both those which do and those which do not involve feeder cells.

Although flow cytometry is commonly used for the isolation and sorting of subpopulations of embryonic and other types of stem cells via various surface markers, the high sensitivity of hESCs has yielded poor survival of the cells following their exposure to the process. By utilizing the ROCK inhibitor at the completion of the cell sorting, however, the researchers found that cell recovery is improved while normal morphology and stable karyotype are also maintained.

According to Jay Glasscock, president of Cell Analysis at BD Biosciences, "Stem cell research is an increasingly complex and exhilarating area of science where researchers are looking to find answers to some of the most difficult-to-treat medical conditions. BD Biosciences is committed to working with the stem cell research community to help develop state-of-the-art tools that support and further enhance experiment capabilities."

Similarly, Thermo Fisher Scientific of Waltham, Massachusetts was also spotlighted in a symposium at the conference entitled, "New Tools and Technologies to Accelerate Stem Cell Research". Featured among the studies that utilize newly developed research tools were such topics as the efficient production of iPS cells, the use of stem cell progenitors to accelerate toxicology screening, the latest developmenets in siRNA (small interfering RNA) technology including more efficient transfection methods that facilitate the study of gene function in neural stem cells, a non-enzymatic subculture of stem cells, proteomic technologies and image analysis techniques applied to stem cell differentiation, the identification and qualitative analysis of genes and proteins involved in stem cell growth and differentiation, and new developments in tissue engineering.

BD Biosciences is one of three business segments within BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) which provides integrated products and services for genomics, proteomics, oncology, immunology, and general drug discovery and development. With global offices throughout the U.S., Canada, Europe, Asia, Japan and Latin America, BD Biosciences has approximately 3,000 employees. In 2008 Thermo Fisher Scientific had revenues of $10.5 billion with more than 34,000 employees and over 350,000 customers. Both companies are traded on the NYSE.

Founded in 2002, the ISSCR is an independent, nonprofit organization, the purpose of which is "to foster the exchange of information on stem cell research", as described on their website.

BioTime Announces Agreement With Millipore

BioTime has announced that its wholly owned subsidiary, Embryome Sciences, has entered into a marketing collaboration with Millipore. According to the terms of the agreement, Millipore will become the worldwide distributor of ACTCellerate(TM) human progenitor cell lines, which are derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) but are not yet fully differentiated. Although researchers hope that the cells may ultimately have therapeutic applications, currently the cells can only be used for drug screening and for further experimental research.

According to Donald O’Neil, director of marketing for stem cells and cell biology at Millipore, "The Millipore team is committed to supplying high quality products to transport the emerging field of regenerative medicine to an increasing level of sophistication. We believe that Embryome Sciences’ novel, highly-purified and scalable progenitor lines have potential to be a significant breakthrough for the industry, and we’re excited to feature them in our rapidly growing family of novel stem cell lines, media, antibodies, cultureware, and characterization kits."

As BioTime and Embryome Sciences CEO, Michael West, Ph.D., adds, "Many researchers prefer to work with well-characterized progenitor cells rather than starting from scratch with embryonic stem cells. The ACTCellerate(TM) product line gives scientists a jump-start on their research by providing a reliable, highly purified source of characterized human progenitor cells from a variety of lineages. We look forward to working with Millipore’s outstanding marketing team to make these cell lines widely available to scientists worldwide, allowing them to more quickly perform the research and development work that may lead to life-saving therapies."

As described on Millipore’s website, "Millipore’s initial offering of Embryome Sciences’ products will include six novel progenitor cell lines and optimized ESpan growth media for the in vitro propagation of each progenitor cell line. Additional cell lines will be introduced frequently, as Embryome Sciences has already isolated over 140 distinct progenitor cell types. The companies anticipate jointly launching 35 cell lines and associated ESpan growth media within the coming 12 months." Unlike traditional methods, the ACTCellerate lines are generated via a two-step multiplex process that isolates and purifies progenitor cells from different lineages in a rapid manner by which the cells are also selected for scalability, robustness and then characterized for gene marker expression as well as phenotype.

Headquarterd in Alameda, California, BioTime is focused on the development and commercialization of technology and products related to blood plasma volume expanders for use in emergency trauma treatment, surgery and related applications. Its wholly owned subsidiary Embryome Sciences is "focused on developing an array of research and therapeutic products using human embryonic stem cell technology", as described on the personal website of Michael West, Ph.D., molecular gerontologist and BioTime’s CEO. Prior to his work with BioTime, Dr. West founded the Geron Corporation, which received FDA approval earlier this year to commence the first human clinical trials ever to be conducted with hESCs.

Millipore Corporation is an S&P 500 company with nearly 6,000 employees worldwide.

(Please see the related news articles on this website, entitled, "BioTime Receives Second Round of Funding", dated July 13, 2009, and "New Members Added to BioTime’s Board of Directors", dated July 7, 2009).

Cellular Dynamics Creates iPS Cells From Human Blood

Today on their website, Cellular Dynamics International (CDI) announces the successful reprogramming of an ordinary human blood cell into an iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cell. The findings will be officially presented two days from now, on July 10, at the annual conference of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) which is being held this week in Barcelona, Spain, from July 8 – 11.

As reported on CDI’s website, "This significant breakthrough provides a readily obtainable source of pluripotent stem cells from the millions of samples in storage at blood repositories and healthcare institutions worldwide." As further stated on CDI’s website, these findings "demonstrate that any stored blood sample is a candidate for iPS cell reprogramming."

According to Chris Kendrick-Parker, chief commercial officer of CDI, "Industry’s challenge was to reliably create iPS cells from a commonly available and easily accessible tissue source and we focused on stored human peripheral blood samples. Generating pluripotent stem cells from small volumes of blood – either freshly collected from a patient or accessed from blood storage repositories, provides a convenient source for generating patient-specific stem cells that are valuable research tools and may one day be used as a cellular therapy to treat disease."

As Emile Nuwaysir, chief operations officer of CDI, adds, "The ability to use common tissue repositories to create iPS cells from donors with known medical history enables us to provide the pharmaceutical industry with a cell portfolio representing individual biology, disease models, retrospective analysis and ethnic diversity. This is the first step in paving the way for large-scale processing and industrialization of iPS cells."

As further described on CDI’s website, "To generate the induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, CDI scientists isolated T-cells, a type of white blood cell, from a 3 ml donor blood sample. The cells were stimulated, expanded and exposed to documented reprogramming factors. iPS cell colonies were observed after three weeks. Analysis revealed that the iPS cells are functionally identical to embryonic stem cells and iPS cells generated from other human tissue sources, that they carry the same genetic background as the source blood sample, and that they have the pluripotent ability to differentiate into any cell type."

Previously, iPS cells had first been created from the skin cells of mice and then from the skin cells of humans. The successful creation of iPS cells from human blood cells demonstrates, at least conceptually, that iPS cells could possibly be created from any type of somatic (non-stem cell) cell. Not only does such a breakthrough eliminate the ethical dilemmas associated with embryonic stem cell research, but it also allows for the creation of patient-specific stem cell therapies.

Of course, patient-specific stem cell therapies are already available with autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells, and experts such as Dr. James Thomson point out that even iPS cells still have another decade to go before they are safe enough to be considered viable for clinical applications. Furthermore, there is really no need for the development of patient-specific stem cell therapies since there already exist certain types of allogeneic (in which the donor and recipient are not the same person) adult stem cells which are known as "universal donor", "immune privileged" cells, meaning that they do not pose any risk of immune rejection, and which are also already clinically available. Nevertheless, this recent breakthrough in the creation of iPS cells from ordinary somatic blood cells represents further proof of the obsolescence of embryonic stem cells as a candidate for clinical therapies.

This week at the ISSCR annual conference, CDI will officially announce and describe their latest iPS cell breakthrough during a poster session that begins at 4:45 p.m. on July 10. (Please see the related news article on this website, entitled, "New Technology Breakthroughs Showcased at Annual Stem Cell Conference", dated July 10, 2009).

High School Coach Heads to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy

Diagnosed in 2005 with multiple sclerosis, Sam Herrell had few options available to him in the U.S., his home country. Now, however, he is traveling to Central America in order to receive an adult stem cell therapy that was pioneered by American doctors but which is not yet available within the United States.

A proud native of Texas, the Ennis Lions football coach has decided to travel to ICM – the Institute for Cellular Medicine – in Central America for treatment with his own adult stem cells. The ICM has an 80% success rate with its patients, but don’t expect the treatment to be available any time soon within the U.S., since the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has made such a procedure legally impossible for doctors to conduct within the United States. Specifically, the FDA has decreed that autologous (in which the donor and recipient are the same person) adult stem cells must be classified and regulated as a "drug", and therefore cannot be used as a clinical therapy until first being subjected to the ordinary FDA laws that govern pharmaceutically manufactured drugs, which is a process that typically requires a decade or more of testing before approval can be obtained. Most patients, with multiple sclerosis as well as other diseases or injuries, cannot wait a decade or longer for treatment, so they are following the U.S. doctors who have set up their clinics outside of U.S. borders. If the FDA would only change their stance on this critically important issue, then the U.S. doctors who pioneered this adult stem cell treatment would be able to administer the therapy within the U.S., and then perhaps there wouldn’t be such an endless debate over embryonic stem cells, which still have years if not decades left before they could be considered for use in clinical therapies. Unlike embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells are already being used in clinics around the world to treat real people with real diseases – but not within the U.S., except for the very limited number of FDA-approved clinical trials that are being conducted.

As Sam Herrell explains, "The thing that’s kind of disappointing is that the neurologists here have nothing that really gives you much hope. All they can do is say keep on this medication and hope it slows down, hope it doesn’t overtake your whole nervous sytsem before they find a cure. Outside the U.S., some things are being done that people have had phenomenal results with, and that’s been encouraging. I really think there’s going to be a cure for it – that’s what I’m hoping for. It’s been encouraging to hear those stories and talk with people."

A number of scientific studies in the medical literature support such claims, not the least of which is an article that was published in the Journal of Translational Medicine in April of 2009, entitled, "Non-expanded adipose stromal vascular fraction cell therapy for multiple sclerosis", by N.H. Riordan et al., in which scientists and doctors elucidate the various cellular and molecular mechanisms that are at work when this type of autologous adult stem cell therapy is implemented as a treatment for multiple sclerosis. Additionally, 3 case studies are described in the paper in which patients with multiple sclerosis showed significant improvement after receiving such a treatment. Of particular significance are the unique immunomodulatory properties of this therapy, which play an especially vital role in a disorder of autoimmune origin such as multiple sclerosis.

In specific reference to ICM, Mr. Herrell adds, "I’ve heard of two different procedures I really think I’ll try. It’s very expensive, but that’s a hurdle I can try to tackle for hope of a cure. I get excited when I talk to those people who have gone outside the country, because they’ve come back with a story of hope. I’m still hopeful for a cure. I’m serious about that. These people who have tried some of these things, they don’t feel better, they feel cured. That’s what I’m hoping for. Then I can still live in Texas."

However, the U.S. FDA still insists that the cells within a person’s own body are "drugs" and therefore cannot be administered, not even to that very same person, for therapeutic purposes until first being subjected to the exact same multi-year, multi-million dollar approval process by which the pharmaceutical industry is regulated. Unless the FDA ever changes its position on this issue, people such as Sam Herrell will be forced to travel outside of the U.S. in order to be treated with their own, autologous adult stem cells.

Fortunately, at least such therapy does exist somewhere in the world, even though not in the United States.

New Director of NIH Chosen

President Obama has nominated the acclaimed geneticist and former head of The Human Genome Project, Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., as the new director of NIH. Dr. Collins will assume the new leadership of NIH pending his Congressional confirmation hearings, which are expected to proceed smoothly.

The announcement comes just one day after NIH released its guidelines governing human embryonic stem cell research.

As President Obama stated, "My administration is committed to promoting scientific integrity and pioneering scientific research and I am confident that Dr. Francis Collins will lead the NIH to achieve these goals."

Dr. Collins has been described as an "evangelical Christian who has defended the inherent compatibility of science and religious beliefs", and although Dr. Collins has a sterling reputation among scientists, reactions from the media are mixed, as critics point out that the religious views which Dr. Collins espouses may interfere with an impartial and objective scientific approach to directing NIH. In an article entitled "Obama Names an Evangelical to Lead the NIH", a U.S. News & World Report article states that "Obama this week picked a Bible-believing, loud, and proud evangelical Christian to head the National Institutes of Health." Any personal religious views to which Dr. Collins might ascribe have certainly not interfered with his scientific objectivity in the past however, as a number of media sources point out, among which is the Wall Street Journal which reported the news in an article the title of which simply read, "Obama Plans to Name Renowned Geneticist to Head NIH."

Dr. Collins earned a B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Virginia in 1970, a Ph.D. in physical chemistry from Yale in 1974, and an M.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1977. He first distinguished himself at the University of Michigan where he gained recognition for his pioneering work in positional cloning, a type of genetic screening and gene identification technique. In 1993 he accepted an invitation to succeed Dr. James Watson (Nobel laureate and co-discoverer with Dr. Francis Crick of the helical structure of DNA) as director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), one of 27 institutes within NIH, which he directed from 1993 to 2008. During this time Dr. Collins also became director of the Human Genome Project, an international research project which resulted in 2003 in the successful mapping of the genetic sequences of 3.1 billion chemical base pairs in the human DNA. Along with Craig Venter, founder and former president of Celera Genomics as well as the founder of The Institute for Genomic Research, Dr. Collins was awarded the "Biography of the Year" award in 2000 by the A&E Network, and U.S. News & World Report together with the Harvard Center for Public Leadership named both Collins and Venter "America’s Best Leaders" in 2005.

In 2006 Dr. Collins authored the book, "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief", in which he describes scientific discoveries as an "opportunity to worship". Dr. Collins awknowledges that he has been highly influenced by C.S. Lewis, especially by the book "Mere Christianity" to which Collins attributes his conversion to Christianity at the age of 27. Currently Dr. Collins serves as president of The BioLogos Foundation, which he founded in 2009, the mission of which is to "contribute to the public voice that represents the harmony of science and faith."

Dr. Collins has received numerous awards and honors throughout his career, including election into the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine, and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

This year the NIH will have $40 billion at its disposal for funding medical research, including that which is to be conducted on human embryonic stem cells.

Bangor Family Heads to Central America for Adult Stem Cell Therapy

Kenneth Kelley, an eight-year old child from the Bangor area will be the first person from Maine to receive adult stem cell therapy for autism. Stem cell therapy for the treatment of autism has been performed in many North American children who have traveled to the ICM clinic in Central America, with several news reports of patient improvements, and one scientific publication from the group supporting the rationale for this therapy (Ichim et al. Stem Cell Therapy for Autism. 2007 Jun 27;5:30).

Autism is a disorder of the brain that occurs as a child is growing up, and is associated with repetitive behavior, lack of ability to interact socially, and impaired communication skills. To date there is no cure for autism, although a variety of experimental interventions are being performed with varying degrees of success.
Adult stem cell therapy for autism is based on the idea that a chronic inflammatory condition in the gut of autistic children may resolve or at least diminished from the healing effects of the mesenchymal stem cells. The other stem cell type that is used for treatment of autism comes from the cord blood. Cord blood stem cells have been demonstrated by numerous American and international scientific groups to secrete factors that promote healing of nerves and enhance oxygenation of the brain.

Marty Kelly, mother of Kenneth, like many parents of autistic children, initially could not believe the diagnosis of autism. Kenneth was 2 years old when his doctors made the diagnosis, which is believed to be made in as many as 1 in 144 children. Marty Kelly, determined to do something about it, arranged for Kenneth to start receiving hyperbaric oxygen treatments for her son, which caused an improvement in his condition. According to her:

"One of the first things we did was buy a hyperbaric oxygen chamber and within a couple of days, he actually sat down and traced the alphabet from A to Z by himself which was huge. First time he’d ever done that."

Hyperbaric oxygen increases growth factor production in the brain, as well as, by providing oxygen theoretically overcomes some of the problems reported in autistic children such as poor oxygenation of certain parts of the brain. In the case of Kenneth, while there were improvements, these were not cures and the underlying condition still caused significant suffering in the Kelley household:

"It’s really hard because he just we can’t go anywhere and we can’t have anyone over. He just screams all day."

Marty is confident adult stem cell therapy will cause benefits in Kenneth based on knowledge of previous children who have been treated with varying degrees of success.

To discuss and learn more about adult stem cell therapy for autism, an Autism Biomedical support group is being created. The first meeting is july 18th at 10 am. To learn more, call 942-2459.

Click the play button in the video below to watch a news report of another autistic child treated with stem cells.